Doc Summary
The RGM-84 Harpoon is a ship-launched, all-weather, over-the-horizon, anti-ship missile that is carried by Royal Navy Type 23 and Type 45 vessels.
It is due to be replaced with the Interim Surface to-Surface Guided Weapon System (I-SSGW) and Future Cruise and Anti-Ship Weapon (FCASW) in due course
The Harpoon surface-to-surface missile was described by the Royal Navy as;
Harpoon is the long range lance of the Type 23 Frigate, capable of destroying enemy ships far beyond the horizon. Fitted to all Type 23 Frigates the Harpoon is a sophisticated anti-ship missile capable of striking targets more than 80 miles away. Harpoon uses a combination of inertial guidance and active radar homing to attack it’s prey. Cruising at Mach 0.9 and carrying a large high explosive warhead it is powered by a lightweight turbojet, but is accelerated at launch by a booster rocket.
It is currently fitted to the Type 23 Frigate and Type 45 Destroyer.
Harpoon Missile History #
Development of the Harpoon missile for the US Navy goes back to the mid-sixties as a counter to surfaced submarines, but for the Royal Navy, it first came into service as a submarine-launched weapon in the mid-seventies.
The US Navy began initial concept studies for an anti-ship missile system in 1965. In July 1971, McDonnell Douglas won a development contract and, in May 1973, the US Navy selected Harpoon. The initial requirement called for a surface, air and sub-surface launched variant of the same missile, and all three entered service in 1977.
The Royal Navy had a requirement for a submarine-launched anti-ship missile for the Under Surface Guided Weapon (UGSW) requirement.
Choices were a new development from Hawker Siddeley, designated CR137, the McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Harpoon and an Anglo-French development called Sub Martel. Sub Martel was a modification of the already-in-service Matra Martel air-to-ground missile but, compared to the already-in-service Harpoon, would require significant development funding.
Although Exocet was in service with both the UK and France, a submarine-launched development project was not considered for UGSW.
In September 1975, the MoD selected the Harpoon missile, the French went on to develop SM39 Exocet, the submarine-launched variant.
HL Deb 23 September 1975 vol 364 cc169-80169 3.0 p.m.
Lord WINTERBOTTOM My Lords, with the permission of the House, I will make a Statement on guided weapons for the Services.
The Government have now decided the next steps to be taken on the procurement of major guided weapons systems for the British Forces. Full development, by the British Aircraft Corporation, of the helicopter anti-ship missile Sea Skua is to proceed. Negotiations will be opened with France and Germany for the procurement, if the terms are right, of their medium-range anti-tank missile Milan, mainly by manufacture under licence in Britain; and with the United States for the procurement, if the terms are right, of McDonnell Douglas’s submarine-launched anti-ship missile Sub-Harpoon. The British Aircraft Corporation’s helicopter-borne anti-tank missile Hawk swing and Hawker Siddeley Dynamics’ submarine-launched anti-ship missile Sub-Martel are to be cancelled.The winding-up of the work on Sub-Martel at Hawker Siddeley Dynamics will, however, inevitably give rise to problems. Other projects which the company have in hand are unlikely to absorb all the design staff who will become available. Some loss of jobs is, therefore, likely to be unavoidable. The Ministry of Defence, however, recognises the extent to which its ability to meet its future needs is dependent on the strength of Hawker Siddeley Dynamics’ design capability.
However, it was recognised from the beginning that the costs of developing Sub-Martel would be very high and that if McDonnell Douglas’s development of their underwater-to-surface guided weapon Harpoon was successful (as it has been) that system was likely to be the more attractive proposition. This has been a particularly difficult issue to decide but the Government have now reached the conclusion that the right course is to terminate the development of Sub-Martel and open negotiations for Sub-Harpoon. The final decision will, of course, be determined by the terms that can be secured. We are making arrangements with the United States Government and McDonnell Douglas for a substantial level of offset to help with the dollar expenditure on Sub-Harpoon and to provide work in the United Kingdom.
A $6m pre-development contract was awarded to McDonnell Douglas to investigate modifications to enable use by Royal Navy submarines. Part of the deal was that British companies would design and develop the torpedo tube launch capsule
Whilst this was ongoing, Norway, the UK, USA, Germany, and the Netherlands had embarked upon the Anti-Ship Supersonic Missile study that would eventually go nowhere.
For the next year or so, there was a great deal of negotiation on UK subcontract components and other industrial issues.
By 1981, the Royal Navy had commenced firing trials of UGM-84B Sub Harpoon from Trafalgar and Swiftsure attack submarines.
Sub Harpoon was first officially deployed on HMS Courageous at the end of the Falklands Conflict in 1982.
Furthermore, a short time after the conflict, some RAF Nimrod MR.2 aircraft were fitted with air-launched Harpoon missiles.
In 1983, McDonnell Douglas offered the 120 nm range RGM-84 Harpoon Block 1C for use on the Royal Navy’s Type 22 and Type 23 frigates. Block 1C offered various improvements including increased range (80 nm), waypoint navigation and lower altitude flight. The surface-launched storage and launching canister was originally developed for hydrofoil deployment.
In competition with Harpoon was a surface-launched variant of Sea Eagle, the P5T. Sea Eagle was by then entering service with the RAF and Fleet Air Arm. The launch canister for Sea Eagle SL was adapted from a lightweight Sea Dart canister.
Whichever missile won, it was intended to equip the first Type 22 Batch III Frigates. Exocet was not considered suitable, and neither was Otomat.
Further details on Sub Harpoon were released in a Parliamentary Written Answer in 1984
HC Deb 24 January 1984 vol 52 c461W461W
Mr. Dalyell asked the Secretary of State for Defence what was the cost of the acceleration of the Sub-Harpoon submarine-launched anti-ship missile into service, and what is the total cost of the Sub-Harpoon missile.
Mr. Lee Sub-Harpoon entered service with the Royal Navy on schedule in early 1982. However, to meet the requirements of the Falklands emergency later that year, a number of submarines were provided with a capability to fire the missile in advance of the dates that had been otherwise planned. Approximately £600,000 was spent to achieve this.
The total estimated cost of the Royal Navy Sub-Harpoon programme is £450 million
In 1984, Harpoon Block 1C won and a contract for £200 million was placed with McDonnell Douglas, to be designated GWS.60.
HC Deb 12 April 1984 vol 58 cc527-39527 3.30 pm
The Minister of State for Defence Procurement (Mr. Geoffrey Pattie) With permission, Mr. Speaker, I wish to make a statement about the procurement of the next generation of surface-to-surface and surface-to-air guided weapons for the Royal Navy.
For some months we have been conducting a competition for a second generation surface-to-surface guided weapon for the four batch III type 22 frigates and the first eight type 23 frigates. The contenders were British Aerospace’s ship-launched Sea Eagle, McDonnell Douglas’s ship-launched Harpoon, Aerospatiale’s Exocet MM40, and versions of Otomat from Oto Melara and Matra. The thorough-going evaluation of these contenders has taken into account performance, cost and timescale considerations, as well as industrial and employment factors.
The competition has been keen and of considerable benefit in assuring value for money. Following the submission of “best and final” offers from the competing contractors the outcome is clear. Having taken all relevant factors into account, the Government have concluded that the best choice on both operational and cost grounds is the McDonnell Douglas Harpoon; a proven system, which has a 100 per cent. success rate in over 200 firings since 1978, and variants of which are already in service with the Royal Navy and RAF.
Subject to agreement with the company on contractual terms and conditions, we will place a fixed price contract worth some £130 million for Harpoon missiles and associated ship systems for the batch III type 22 and the type 23 frigates. The total value of the programme is of the order of £200 million.
Sub Harpoon was withdrawn from Royal Navy service in 2003 with no direct replacement but a surface-launched Harpoon Sustainment Programme was initiated to maintain Harpoon to its OSD.
Harpoon originally equipped Type 22 Frigates and is now out of service, replaced by the Naval Strike Missile (NSM)
Some Type 45 Destroyers have also received the launching system from withdrawn Type 22 Frigates.
Harpoon Capabilities #
After being launched through a torpedo tube, the sub-harpoon capsule is activated by the snapping of a safety lanyard. Fins deploy to ensure the capsule assumes a vertical position, and it then rises to the surface when the nose and tail caps blow off.
The rocket booster ignites and the missile is propelled to a suitable altitude when the main propulsion motor fires.
For the surface-launched variant, currently, in service, the missile is fired from an angled tube launcher with frangible front and base caps.
The tubes are arranged in groups of four, with two groups arranged to fire port and starboard.
The missile is 4.6m long and weighs 691 kg (with booster). The warhead weighs 221 kg, approximately the same as a Paveway IV, or half the weight of the Storm Shadow warhead.
Harpoon has a typical cruise speed of high subsonic.
Guidance for Harpoon is performed initially by information provided by the launch platform, waypoints and mid-course changes can also be programmed into the inertial guidance system. Terminal guidance is carried out using the integral radar seeker. The attack profile is also selectable at launch.
The website Missile Threat describes the Block 1C variant in service with the Royal Navy as;
Block IC (RGM/UGM-84D)
Introduced in 1985, the Blk IC differs from previous iterations in its flight path, guidance, and targeting technology.
Whereas Blk IB and IA could perform either a low apogee pop-up trajectory or a sea-skimming approach in its terminal phase, the Blk IC can perform both. In addition to improved ECCM performance, Blk IC has a relatively higher altitude in the first part of its flight path to avoid friendly ships and other land masses that may be in the missile’s path. A change in the type of fuel used in the missile increased its range to 124 km.10
Because of the lack of a data link and the radar terminal guidance feature, Royal Navy Harpoons are often considered to be obsolete in a contemporary operating environment. Future developments, not currently in service with the Royal Navy, are planned to incorporate improved target discrimination and data links to enable its deployment in complex environments with civilian and military vessels in the same area.
Click HERE to read about other UK Complex Weapons
If you found value in this article, help me keep Think Defence going
Think Defence is a hobby, a serious hobby, but a hobby nonetheless. I have removed those annoying adverts, but hosting fees, software subscriptions and other services add up.
To help me keep the show on the road, I ask that you support the site in any way you can. It is hugely appreciated.
You can click on an affiliate link, Buy Me a Coffee at https://ko-fi.com/thinkdefence, download an e-book at https://payhip.com/thinkdefence or even get some TD merch at https://www.redbubble.com/people/source360/
Youtubers, if you are going to lift content from here, the decent thing to do would credit me
