Think Defence hopes to start sensible conversations about UK defence issues, no agenda or no campaign but there might be one or two posts on containers, bridges and mexeflotes!
Another thing is how do you target it? Probably from a manned or unmanned ISTAR asset – at which point isn’t it more cost effective to just drop a bomb on the target from the ISTAR asset?
All Politicians are the Same September 21, 2013
we have seen it and if we have total air supremacy allowing the UAV to target the MBT on request why nit simply have a helo or CAS aircraft with a Brimstone or Hellfire that could react much faster.
DavidNiven September 21, 2013
I think fire shadow could fulfill the role where the infantry call upon fire support to take out a target.
See it, tell them to fire it off towards your location and tell them the target their looking for while you update all the way to the target if it moves.
No need for a UAV.
DavidNiven September 21, 2013
Although just remembered that fire shadow is probably a lot slower, but still.
BUG September 22, 2013
I like the concept behind this, and the maximisation of technology derived from CAMM and other areas (kinetic energy killer), MBDA are dealing with tehnology advancement most correctly and dynamically, involving, and encouraging the involvement of the whole company everywhere………….all kudos to them!
HOPLITE has a lot of possibility but is a concept at the moment but as I’ve alread said, a lot of it is derived from what is currentl available. 2035? Nah, expect to see this progress a lot sooner than that. For the moment, Sea Ceptor and FAADS are where the immediate priority lies………………….3-5 years time that could easily change.
S O September 23, 2013
MBDA has the habit of publishing one ‘vision’ for some gold-plated, bug-free high tech stuff per year. It’s a marketing ploy.
Similar: DCNS (shipyard) with its annual freak ship concepts.
Leave a Reply
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions. Personal data will be used for personalisation of ads and cookies may be used for personalised and non-personalised advertising
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
“What’s not to like?”
Well it doesn’t exist yet for one.
Another thing is how do you target it? Probably from a manned or unmanned ISTAR asset – at which point isn’t it more cost effective to just drop a bomb on the target from the ISTAR asset?
we have seen it and if we have total air supremacy allowing the UAV to target the MBT on request why nit simply have a helo or CAS aircraft with a Brimstone or Hellfire that could react much faster.
I think fire shadow could fulfill the role where the infantry call upon fire support to take out a target.
See it, tell them to fire it off towards your location and tell them the target their looking for while you update all the way to the target if it moves.
No need for a UAV.
Although just remembered that fire shadow is probably a lot slower, but still.
I like the concept behind this, and the maximisation of technology derived from CAMM and other areas (kinetic energy killer), MBDA are dealing with tehnology advancement most correctly and dynamically, involving, and encouraging the involvement of the whole company everywhere………….all kudos to them!
HOPLITE has a lot of possibility but is a concept at the moment but as I’ve alread said, a lot of it is derived from what is currentl available. 2035? Nah, expect to see this progress a lot sooner than that. For the moment, Sea Ceptor and FAADS are where the immediate priority lies………………….3-5 years time that could easily change.
MBDA has the habit of publishing one ‘vision’ for some gold-plated, bug-free high tech stuff per year. It’s a marketing ploy.
Similar: DCNS (shipyard) with its annual freak ship concepts.