Think Defence
 
  • Delve into Think Defence
    • Tag Map
    • Links
    • Archives
    • About
    • Contact
  • Revolving Doors
  • Categories
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • Business and Politics
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • History, Humour and Culture
    • News, Images, Videos and Brochures
    • Think Defence Admin and Updates
  • Open Threads
    • Open Thread – Land, Sea and Air
    • Open Thread – Rumble in the CVF Jungle
    • Open Thread – Politics and Business
    • Open Thread – Humour and History
    • Open Thread – Anything Else
    • Open Thread (old)
    • Open Thread II (old)
  • Comments
  •  

Home » Posts tagged 'Royal Navy'

  • Learning Lessons from Libya, ISR and Maritime Land Attack

    • January 29, 2012
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air, Thoughts on the Future
    • 532 comments

    Reality is depressing and I am even struggling with the motivation to finish the bridging series, even though it’s 90% done. So ignoring the fact that we are poorer than a jobless church mouse yet continue with our fantasy spending plans I thought a fantasy kit post was in order. A recent Janes Defence Weekly reported on a Royal Navy [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Some Ships

    • January 4, 2012
    • By Think Defence
    • News, Images, Videos and Brochures
    • 1 comment

    HMS Edinburgh (foreground) conducts her first Replenishment at Sea of their South Atlantic deployment with RFA Black Rover off the coast of West Africa. HMS Edinburgh is currently deployed to conduct maritime security patrols around the British South Atlantic Islands, including the Falklands and South Georgia. On her journey south the type 42 Destroyer will visit a variety of countries off the [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • An Empty Quiver

    • November 23, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 77 comments

    The Portsmouth News has reported that HMS Westminster was only carrying 4 Sea Wolf missiles when conducting operations off Libya, or enough for two shots against an airborne threat, missile or aircraft for example. Concerned Royal Navy officers have revealed the Portsmouth-based frigate was ‘dangerously under-defended’ when she was called to patrol close to the Libyan port city of Benghazi [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • LM Vigilance Pod

    • November 21, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 23 comments

    The venerable Sea King ASac Mk7′s have been in the news quite a bit recently, especially given their significant contribution to operations in Afghanistan but the Crows Nest project which seeks to define a replacement has yet to step out into much of the public eye, it being officially a ‘non programme’ at the moment.   Given the Sea King Out of Service [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Defence – The Royal Navy

    • November 10, 2011
    • By IXION
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 167 comments

    Next in the series of guest posts on the future of the British Armed forces from Ixion.   I will start with making an apology, for making no apologies about my resistance to CVF, nor my deriding them as white elephants. They are IMHO the biggest pissing up the wall of defence budgets in history. I remain opposed to them [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Why Type 45 Gold Plating Matters

    • November 3, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 114 comments

    It is fashionable to deride the ‘gold plating’ of defence equipment that inevitably leads a spiral of increasing costs and decreasing quantities but we must not forget that sometimes that gold plating is there for a reason. The Type 45 is the poster child of the gold plating tendency; everyone (me included) cites the project as a typical example, pointing [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Too Many Tasks – Not Enough Ships

    • November 1, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 70 comments

    Reported in the Telegraph today was a story about the lack of ships available for defence of the home islands. The Navy normally provides a minimum coverage of a frigate or destroyer fulfilling the role of Fleet Ready Escort (FRE) in order to be able to respond quickly to a potential threat at home or abroad. However, slashed Defence budgets [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • 11 on the Awesome Scale

    • November 1, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 6 comments

    You can take your sleek super yachts or 50 knots littoral combat ships and put them you know where seriously, how cool is this? It is designed to meet the needs of the offshore wind industry but it has many features that lend itself to military service, I especially like the ease of handling and of course, modularity. Although seemingly [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • The First Sea Lord

    • October 18, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 400 comments

    Defence News recently ran an interview with Sir Mark Stanhope, 1SL, in which he made some interesting comments. In response to a question about selling sea power; The sea blindness which we talk about a great deal is a simple feature of the modern world, where few people appreciate the importance of freedom of the seas to stocking the shelves [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Naval Mine Countermeasures

    • October 16, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 16 comments

    A diversion from the shabby goings on elsewhere. The sea mine is the IED of the maritime environment, cheap, easy to deploy and with a tactical and strategic effect out of all proportion to the resources expended.  Libya Standing NATO Mine Countermeasures Group 1 (SNMCMG1) formerly known as Mine Countermeasures Force Northern Europe (MCMFORNORTH) and before that as Standing Naval [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • TYPE 27 – One tier, evolvable and affordable

    • September 27, 2011
    • By McZ
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 157 comments

    A guest post from McZ Since roughly ten years, the RN is struggling to bring up a viable plan to replace the current T22 and T23 classes of surface combatants. Four different projects fielding three workgroups were formed, and while they delivered on analyzing the strategic environment, they failed to translate into actual acquisition. Instead, FSC and predecessors fit well [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • A Ship That Is Not a Frigate – Follow up and Feedback

    • September 14, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 273 comments

    First of all, I would like to thank everyone for their considered feedback and comments on the Security, Interdiction and Maritime Support System (SIMSS) concept I described recently. For what is a hair brain scheme by some random chap off the internet for it to have gathered over 400 comments is a sign of just how engaged the Think Defence [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • A Ship that is Not a Frigate – Part 5 (Operational Concepts)

    • August 29, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 428 comments

    Operating in singles, multiples and a part of a larger force the key attributes of SIMSS is flexibility and adaptability. SIMSS is somewhat of a blank canvas and it is likely that uses will be found for it beyond its initial design and operational concept. When testing the concept of SIMSS it might be interesting to compare it against recent [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • A Ship that is Not a Frigate – Part 4 (Modules and Payloads)

    • August 29, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • no comments

    One of the ways in which we can squeeze maximum value from this concept is to embrace payload modularity. The fundamental thought process behind payload modularity is to sever the link between the means of transport (the ship) and things it carries to complete its mission. Integral to the ship would be accommodation for the permanent crew, power, propulsion and [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • A Ship that is Not a Frigate – Part 3 (Design Discussion)

    • August 29, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • no comments

    One of the trends seems to favour compact vessels and then shoe horn as much equipment as possible and in a nod to those secondary roles, squeeze in a couple of containers spots and call that job done, again, a distortion of priorities. Although the well worn phrase about cheap steel and free air only has some validity in the [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
 

« Older Entries

 

Recent Posts

  • Vital Defence Equipment
  • Reasons for Rafale
  • A Think Defence Piece About Think Defence
  • Parliamentary Answers – to 8th February 2012
  • Select Committee – Operations in Libya
  • Magic Bullets
  • It Was Different in My Day
  • Nothing New Under the Sun
  • The Post Afghanistan Vehicle Lottery
  • UK Military Bridging – Look Back Look Forward
  • UK Military Bridging – Equipment (Trackway)
  • UK Military Bridging – Equipment (Air Portable Bridges)
  • UK Military Bridging – Equipment (BR90 and REBS)
  • Industrial and Technology Matters
  • Consultants on Five Grand a Day at the MoD
 

Advert

 

Search Think Defence

 

Recent Comments

  • martin on Reasons for RafaleEverything i have read points to price although I think the comments made by TD are also very valid. India's
  • martin on The Post Afghanistan Vehicle Lottery500 million is a hell of allot of money when not actually getting any vehicles. We can talk about 15%
  • wf on A Think Defence Piece About Think Defence@jed: Last time I was subscribed it had a scrollback of 20 posts. Very easy to burst over that, on
  • jed on A Think Defence Piece About Think DefenceWF I already subscribe to an RSS feed for all comments! Just need to hunt around to find it I
  • Gareth Jones on Magic BulletsSome interesting figures in the link I posted above. "Today 45% of the worlds population live in cities. 470-85% are
  • wf on A Think Defence Piece About Think DefenceRSS feed for comments. Make it for all comments, and have a 200 comment buffer: we all mix between threads
  • wf on Reasons for RafaleRe the Mirage 2000, it's noticeable that both Taiwan and the UAE are trying to get rid of their 2000-5's,
  • Ant on A Think Defence Piece About Think DefenceShort wishlist: 1) Edit function for those "oh bolloks" moments. 2) Comment box larger and wider so you can see
 

Upcoming Posts

  • The Future of the British Army – Cyber
  • The Future of the British Army – Expeditionary Air Locations
  • The Warrior
  • A Springer Shaped Waste of £7 Million
  • Yet Another Look at FRES UV
  • Being Serious About Piracy
  • The US Defence Strategy Review
  • The Future of the British Army – Fuel and Power
  • Squid Wars
  • Mini Missiles and Guided Bombs

Subscribe to Think Defence Don't miss it - Subscribe by RSS.

 
 
 
  • Delve into Think Defence
  • Revolving Doors
  • Categories
  • Open Threads
  • Comments
  •  

WPZOOMDesigned by

Copyright © 2012 Think Defence. All rights reserved.