Think Defence
 
  • Delve into Think Defence
    • Tag Map
    • Links
    • Archives
    • About
    • Contact
  • Revolving Doors
  • Categories
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • Business and Politics
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • History, Humour and Culture
    • News, Images, Videos and Brochures
    • Think Defence Admin and Updates
  • Open Threads
    • Open Thread – Land, Sea and Air
    • Open Thread – Rumble in the CVF Jungle
    • Open Thread – Politics and Business
    • Open Thread – Humour and History
    • Open Thread – Anything Else
    • Open Thread (old)
    • Open Thread II (old)
  • Comments
  •  

Home » Posts tagged 'Army'

  • A Good Use of 17 Minutes and 22 Seconds

    • January 30, 2012
    • By Think Defence
    • News, Images, Videos and Brochures
    • 2 comments

    In the course of my research for the UK Military Bridging series I have used British Pathe quite a bit, it is a fantastic resource for researching almost any subject and not only for UK subjects. One of my favourite clips is one on the Royal Army Service Corps, the forerunner of today’s Royal Logistic Corps. Click here for an [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Multi Role Brigades

    • January 25, 2012
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 539 comments

    The Strategic Defence and Security Review framed the future of the British Army in terms of the Multi Role Brigade. This had been signalled from as long ago as 2008 and subsequently featured as part of the Future Army Structure and Future Army Structure (Next Steps) initiatives. This original thinking envisaged 8 identical Brigades and 3 deployable Divisional HQ’s, each [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • A Forward Presence Army

    • November 1, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 9 comments

    Throughout the Future Of series of posts I have put forward the basic premise that in order to deliver greater security the UK needs to have a smaller but highly effective core fighting force coupled with a much greater emphasis on building local security capabilities, mentoring, defence diplomacy and joining the instruments of development aid, military capability, industry & commerce, [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • The Future of the British Army 08 – ISTAR and Formation Reconnaissance (03) A Not So Sensible Future

    • July 2, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 83 comments

    If we cast our gaze back to the Future Family of Light Armoured Vehicles (FFLAV) study that ultimately spawned TRACER and MRAV it is as relevant today as it was then. It came to the conclusion that what was needed was a three tier vehicle fleet As per the previous post, a sensible solution is to make do with what [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • New Warriors in Afghanistan

    • June 28, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 41 comments

    Although they have been in Afghanistan for some time, 70 Warriors have received a range of modifications called Theatre Entry Standard (Herrick) or TES(H). The total upgrade package has cost £30m and obtained under an Urgen Operational Requirement. BAE Systems has previously developed and produced over 70 UOR (Urgent Operational Requirement) modifications for Warrior to prepare them for operations in [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • The Future of the British Army 07 – ISTAR and Formation Reconnaissance (02) A Sensible Future

    • June 24, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 26 comments

    In the previous post I looked at a few issues that might influence equipment and structure decisions. Do we employ stealth or fight for information, have organic or non organic reconnaissance units and what is the relative importance of secondary roles that reconnaissance units tend to get used for. If the answer to the first question is to use stealth [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • The Future of the British Army 06 – ISTAR and Formation Reconnaissance (01)

    • June 18, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 59 comments

    When it comes to reconnaissance there are many issues to look at, first of course is what does it mean, then, do we fight for information or do we sneak around looking for it, how is technology likely to impact the role, what about the secondary non reconnaissance roles that we have traditionally used the existing equipment for and that [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Medium Armour – what is it, and what does it mean for the post 2020 force structure?

    • June 16, 2011
    • By Jed
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 101 comments

    A guest post from Jed.   The term “medium armour’ is banded around in connection with the SDSR post 2020 force structure, but what exactly does that term mean in this context ? The Army has been ‘experimenting’ with medium armoured formations on paper, and in exercises at BATUS in Canada for some years, in the form of mixed formations [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • The Future of the British Army 05 – Heavy Metal

    • June 12, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 137 comments

    People have been predicting the demise of the tank since the first ones crashed through the barbed wire in the Battle of Somme in 1916. Since then they have shown remarkable resilience with the last major tank battle that involved UK forces less than a decade ago in 2003, other conflicts elsewhere has shown the continued utility of the main [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • MoD Orders 7.62mm MINIMI

    • June 8, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 55 comments

    According to a few outlets the MoD has awarded a production contract to FN Herstal for a quantity of 176, 7,62m MINIMI light machine guns. This is a the culmination of a study that started in 2009, looking at ways of reducing the load on dismounted infantry. The aim was to find something that had the punch of the GPMG [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • The Future of the British Army 04 – Structures

    • June 5, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 180 comments

    It would be the easiest thing in the world to write a post that demanded more, more people, more money and more equipment but as painful as shrinkage is, it is simply unavoidable. Having watched a medal ceremony on the TV tonight it brought home how the Army, like the other services, are not really about what calibre rifle, how [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • The Army Makes Its Resource Play

    • June 3, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 38 comments

    You would have had to be as reclusive as Gadaffi this week not to have noticed the Army making its play for future budgets. Widely predicted to be being lined up for a serious cut post Afghanistan, maybe even further than FF20, it is, as they say, getting its digs in early. Various articles in the mainstream media, a couple [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • The Future of the British Army 03 – Rank and Size

    • June 1, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 107 comments

    The first part of this post is to challenge a few assumptions and ask a few questions, I don’t have the answers but thought it might be an interesting exercise in challenging the accepted wisdom. We make the assumption that land forces have to be organised in hierarchical formations of units, sub units, HQ’s, brigades, divisions, squadrons, batteries and company [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • The Future of the British Army 02 – Tasks and Capabilities

    • May 31, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 97 comments

    Future Force 2020 set out a list of objectives, tasks and force levels that post Afghanistan, in the land of budgetary milk and honey, the services would evolve into. Personally, I think the perennial strategy of hoping for jam tomorrow is hugely naive, it isn’t going to happen yet FF20 makes the assumption that the 2015 SDSR will see a [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • The Future of the British Army 01 – Scene Setting

    • May 31, 2011
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 40 comments

    Having built up a bit of momentum with the RN and RAF series it has been pretty difficult to get into the Land domain and by taking a service centric structure it has exposed the weakness of thinking along these strictly service lines. If we look at almost any operation it is obvious that no one service is dominant to [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
 

« Older Entries

 

Recent Posts

  • Vital Defence Equipment
  • Reasons for Rafale
  • A Think Defence Piece About Think Defence
  • Parliamentary Answers – to 8th February 2012
  • Select Committee – Operations in Libya
  • Magic Bullets
  • It Was Different in My Day
  • Nothing New Under the Sun
  • The Post Afghanistan Vehicle Lottery
  • UK Military Bridging – Look Back Look Forward
  • UK Military Bridging – Equipment (Trackway)
  • UK Military Bridging – Equipment (Air Portable Bridges)
  • UK Military Bridging – Equipment (BR90 and REBS)
  • Industrial and Technology Matters
  • Consultants on Five Grand a Day at the MoD
 

Advert

 

Search Think Defence

 

Recent Comments

  • martin on The Post Afghanistan Vehicle Lottery500 million is a hell of allot of money when not actually getting any vehicles. We can talk about 15%
  • wf on A Think Defence Piece About Think Defence@jed: Last time I was subscribed it had a scrollback of 20 posts. Very easy to burst over that, on
  • jed on A Think Defence Piece About Think DefenceWF I already subscribe to an RSS feed for all comments! Just need to hunt around to find it I
  • Gareth Jones on Magic BulletsSome interesting figures in the link I posted above. "Today 45% of the worlds population live in cities. 470-85% are
  • wf on A Think Defence Piece About Think DefenceRSS feed for comments. Make it for all comments, and have a 200 comment buffer: we all mix between threads
  • wf on Reasons for RafaleRe the Mirage 2000, it's noticeable that both Taiwan and the UAE are trying to get rid of their 2000-5's,
  • Ant on A Think Defence Piece About Think DefenceShort wishlist: 1) Edit function for those "oh bolloks" moments. 2) Comment box larger and wider so you can see
  • Brian Black on The Post Afghanistan Vehicle LotteryBob, you've asked that we compare the half billion cost of the ASCOD-SV development contract with other AFV programmes, notably
 

Upcoming Posts

  • Squid Wars
  • Another Look at Recce
  • A Modern Day WOMBAT
  • The Warrior
  • A Comedic Tour de Force
  • Soft Power or Soft Option
  • Throw it off the ramp
  • Another Busy Time for HMS Ocean
  • The Future of the British Army – Fuel and Power
  • Can the buying of military equipment ever be efficient?

Subscribe to Think Defence Don't miss it - Subscribe by RSS.

 
 
 
  • Delve into Think Defence
  • Revolving Doors
  • Categories
  • Open Threads
  • Comments
  •  

WPZOOMDesigned by

Copyright © 2012 Think Defence. All rights reserved.