Think Defence
 
  • Delve into Think Defence
    • Tag Map
    • Links
    • Archives
    • About
    • Contact
  • Revolving Doors
  • Categories
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • Business and Politics
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • History, Humour and Culture
    • News, Images, Videos and Brochures
    • Think Defence Admin and Updates
  • Open Threads
    • Open Thread – Land, Sea and Air
    • Open Thread – Rumble in the CVF Jungle
    • Open Thread – Politics and Business
    • Open Thread – Humour and History
    • Open Thread – Anything Else
    • Open Thread (old)
    • Open Thread II (old)
  • Comments
  •  

Home » Posts tagged 'Trident'

  • Could Devolution Kill Trident

    • January 20, 2012
    • By Think Defence
    • Business and Politics
    • 99 comments

    The activity on the Scottish Devolution front is ramping up, lots of news to digest on the political front but this, the Secretary of State for Defence weighed in with an uncharacteristically forthright response to Alex Sammond and the Scottish National Party. The key themes for the SNP are easy enough to spell out - Scotlandwould not be a member of Nato and [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Squeal Piggy Squeal

    • September 15, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 21 comments

    From the SNP’s Election manifesto Instead of cutting £500 million next year from the money Scotland has already earmarked to invest in recovery – at a potential cost of 9,000 jobs – we believe they should find the savings from those things that most Scots don’t want – for example, by scrapping the £5 billion ID card project and the [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Back Door Disarmament

    • September 13, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 39 comments

    I know this sounds like the title of some dodgy porn film but this is exactly what is happening with Trident, if we are to believe the papers and other media outlets By pushing Trident into the MoD’s Core Budget the tofu munching, yoghurt knitting class (that would be the Conservatives and Liberal Democrat’s) have effectively pushed us closer to [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Or are we?

    • July 30, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 5 comments

    Perhaps the Treasury are moving the Trident funds into the MoD’s budget, the MoD in effect getting more money but paying for Trident replacement. No, didn’t think that was likely Is a half rice/half chips moment looming where the MoD pay some and so does the Treasury? In the war of words between now and the Comprehensive Spending Review, which, [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • That’s it then, we are all fucked

    • July 30, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 14 comments

    continue reading »

     
     
  • RUSI – Continuous At Sea Deterrence

    • July 28, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 32 comments

    RUSI have published another paper on the options for the UK’s nuclear deterrent. In the paper, Professor Chalmers assesses four possible options for maintaining both an effective nuclear deterrent and also reducing costs in light of anticipated budget restrictions. The options include: 1.       A ‘Normally-CASD’ Submarine Force – Extend the Vanguard-class submarines, delay the start of peak spending on the [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Trident and the Core Budget – In or Out

    • July 18, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 5 comments

    Just been watching Liam Fox on the Andrew Marr show in which he asked Liam Fox if the Trident replacement would be in the core budget or not, pretty straightforward question. Were you expecting a straight answer? Here is what he said There has always been an understanding that the budget for the nuclear deterrent came from outside the defence [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • A Cheaper Deterrent – Part 2

    • July 17, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 30 comments

    With news filtering out that the Treasury wants any Trident replacement to be funded from the MoD’s core budget instead of a special reserve, I thought having another look at a cheaper way of doing this is timely. This news is a rumour, it may or may not happen and even if it does, who knows what will be included [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Life on Trident

    • May 20, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • no comments

    A good article from the Guardian At any moment, one of Britain’s four Trident submarines is out there, somewhere, patrolling a continent-sized patch of the Atlantic. When the 160-strong crew slip beneath the waves off Scotland’s west coast, that’s the last anyone sees of them for three months. Powered by a nuclear reactor, the submarines are almost silent and virtually [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Red Lines

    • May 11, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 5 comments

    In all the horse trading that accompanies the Conservative and Liberal Democrats rush to power one wonders if trident appears anywhere on a list of things that cannot be negotiated on? I predict; No decision on a Trident replacement but that it will be included in the forthcoming Strategic Defence and Security Review.

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Back to the Future – The Trident Issue

    • May 5, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 13 comments

    It is obvious that the replacement for the Vanguard class of SSBN submarines and Trident missile is unfinished business for many and it has emerged as a fundamental difference between the parties in the run up to the election. In a letter to The Times a number of former ‘serious people’ have openly questioned the Liberal Democrat approach to defence [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • A Cheaper Deterrent

    • April 19, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 103 comments

    The comments on the earlier post about the Liberal Democrat election manifesto got me thinking, are there cheaper alternatives than 4 new boats and a refreshed Trident? Air Launched We all understand that an air launched Tomahawk is unlikely to survive against a modern, integrated air defence system any air launched system would need another delivery missile. The Storm Shadow [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • FDR – Maritime Futures – part 2 the Submarine Fleet

    • January 25, 2010
    • By Jed
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 8 comments

    So in the last instalment written for Think Defence as part of the FDR series I concentrated on the surface fleet. By comparison the submarine service is easier to discuss, yet more contentious; because I am going to include discussion of the nuclear deterrent. SSN fleet As is well known the the SSN fleet will shrink to 7 with the [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
 

 

Recent Posts

  • Vital Defence Equipment
  • Reasons for Rafale
  • A Think Defence Piece About Think Defence
  • Parliamentary Answers – to 8th February 2012
  • Select Committee – Operations in Libya
  • Magic Bullets
  • It Was Different in My Day
  • Nothing New Under the Sun
  • The Post Afghanistan Vehicle Lottery
  • UK Military Bridging – Look Back Look Forward
  • UK Military Bridging – Equipment (Trackway)
  • UK Military Bridging – Equipment (Air Portable Bridges)
  • UK Military Bridging – Equipment (BR90 and REBS)
  • Industrial and Technology Matters
  • Consultants on Five Grand a Day at the MoD
 

Advert

 

Search Think Defence

 

Recent Comments

  • martin on The Post Afghanistan Vehicle Lottery500 million is a hell of allot of money when not actually getting any vehicles. We can talk about 15%
  • wf on A Think Defence Piece About Think Defence@jed: Last time I was subscribed it had a scrollback of 20 posts. Very easy to burst over that, on
  • jed on A Think Defence Piece About Think DefenceWF I already subscribe to an RSS feed for all comments! Just need to hunt around to find it I
  • Gareth Jones on Magic BulletsSome interesting figures in the link I posted above. "Today 45% of the worlds population live in cities. 470-85% are
  • wf on A Think Defence Piece About Think DefenceRSS feed for comments. Make it for all comments, and have a 200 comment buffer: we all mix between threads
  • wf on Reasons for RafaleRe the Mirage 2000, it's noticeable that both Taiwan and the UAE are trying to get rid of their 2000-5's,
  • Ant on A Think Defence Piece About Think DefenceShort wishlist: 1) Edit function for those "oh bolloks" moments. 2) Comment box larger and wider so you can see
  • Brian Black on The Post Afghanistan Vehicle LotteryBob, you've asked that we compare the half billion cost of the ASCOD-SV development contract with other AFV programmes, notably
 

Upcoming Posts

  • The US Defence Strategy Review
  • A Typhoon Future
  • Can the buying of military equipment ever be efficient?
  • Winding Down the Air War in Afghanistan
  • Wheels v tracks and a discussion about mobility
  • Soft Power or Soft Option
  • Being Serious About Piracy
  • A Modern Day WOMBAT
  • Deception and the Million Pound Missile
  • A Comedic Tour de Force

Subscribe to Think Defence Don't miss it - Subscribe by RSS.

 
 
 
  • Delve into Think Defence
  • Revolving Doors
  • Categories
  • Open Threads
  • Comments
  •  

WPZOOMDesigned by

Copyright © 2012 Think Defence. All rights reserved.