Think Defence
 
  • Delve into Think Defence
    • Tag Map
    • Links
    • Archives
    • About
    • Contact
  • Revolving Doors
  • Categories
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • Business and Politics
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • History, Humour and Culture
    • News, Images, Videos and Brochures
    • Think Defence Admin and Updates
  • Open Threads
    • Open Thread – Land, Sea and Air
    • Open Thread – Rumble in the CVF Jungle
    • Open Thread – Politics and Business
    • Open Thread – Humour and History
    • Open Thread – Anything Else
    • Open Thread (old)
    • Open Thread II (old)
  • Comments
  •  

Home » Posts tagged 'Defence Reviews'

  • The Emperors New Combats

    • September 25, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air, Thoughts on the Future
    • 23 comments

    Military fashion delivers more than its fair share of acronyms and buzzwords, in a game of bullshit bingo the card would need to be the size of a newspaper. As the COIN theory seems to being discredited and replaced with whatever comes next it is interesting to note that it’s predecessor seems to be making a comeback. The Revolution in [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Why Things Don’t Happen – RN underfunding

    • August 23, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Business and Politics
    • 120 comments

    Out today from RUSI is a paper from Vice-Admiral Sir Jeremy Blackham KCB and Gwyn Prins from the LSE that makes a case for spending on the Royal Navy The defence review is occurring at a time of extreme financial pressure at home and considerable military risk in Afghanistan. Yet it would be a grave failure if it attended principally – or [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Pallets and Containers

    • August 15, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 18 comments

    Completing our look at logistics I am going to delve into the complex world of pallets. Anyone thinking that pallet dimensions would be coordinated with vehicle dimensions, aircraft hold dimensions and ISO containers is in for a shock! We know that ISO containers are the desired method of shipping by road, rail and sea. Their large size and weight means [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • FDR – Land (Towards Vehicle Coherence Part 3)

    • August 15, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 15 comments

    Any discussion on vehicle coherence should logically be proceeded by the finalisation of doctrine and their resultant structures; do we go down the medium weight path as envisaged by FRES, are square armoured regiments supported by armoured infantry still relevant, are the multi equipment brigades the way forward or do we simply have lots of light infantry supported by a [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • FDR – Land (Towards Vehicle Coherence Part 2)

    • August 14, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 3 comments

    In Part 1 of this series I looked out the disadvantages of having too many types of vehicle fulfilling similar roles and with similar capabilities. To start off Part 2 I am going to look at a single vehicle type, the GMLRS. GMLRS is a vitally useful system, highly precise, incredibly effective and with utility in all most spectrums of [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • FDR – LAND (Towards Vehicle Coherence – Part 1)

    • August 11, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 6 comments

    The desire to consolidate the Army’s vehicle fleet is about more than mere neatness, the more vehicle types we have, the more we need vehicle mechanics to be trained and when they are on a training course who is actually doing the spanner bashing, the more spares we need, the more contracts we have to manage, the more driver training, [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • FDR – Land (Logistics and Combat Service Support #3)

    • July 31, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 35 comments

    In the last of the series on logistics I am going to look at containerisation and trucks, sorry it’s a bit long The Army is generally moving towards a rational and coherent fleet of logistic vehicles. The old Bedford MK’s and TM’s are slowly going out of service to be eventually replaced by the MAN Military Trucks Support Vehicle (SV) [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • FDR – Land (Logistics and Combat Service Support #2)

    • July 27, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 7 comments

    The Royal Logistic Corps is making a huge contribution to operations in Afghanistan, however, the overall MoD wide management of supply chain accounting has come in for some severe criticism, the NAO releasing a fairly damning report on equipment accounting procedures. The NAO report stated “Despite action by the Department to improve its asset management and accounting, the issues I [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • FDR – Land (Logistics and Combat Service Support #1)

    • July 26, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 12 comments

    The Royal Logistics Corps is not nicknamed the Really Large Corps for nothing; it is the single largest element of the British Army and was formed in 1993 by amalgamating Royal Army Ordnance Corps, Royal Pioneer Corps, Army Catering Corps, Royal Corps of Transport and the posties from the Royal Engineers. One of the problems with the RLC is that [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • FDR Land – (Artillery)

    • July 23, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 37 comments

    For clarity, I have decided to call this post ‘artillery’ rather than anything trendy like joint fires or air land integration. Artillery has had a mini renaissance in Afghanistan with the continuing and increasing use of GMLRS, the 70km sniper, 105mm and even the humble mortar. With likely future conflicts taking place over a wider area there is a trend [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • A New Approach to our FDR Posts

    • July 22, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 6 comments

    In the final few FDR posts left before I start a consolidation and presentation exercise (which will resurrect the Wiki) I am going to structure them in two sections where relevant. We all know that the forthcoming review is going to be nothing more than an exercise in slashing costs with a thin veneer of strategic direction. Objective 1 – Short Term [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • We Have to be Ready For Anything

    • July 14, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 9 comments

    An interesting article from Alexander Woolfson in the Standpoint Magazine The most famous post-war assessment of Britain’s international position came in 1962 from the US Secretary of State Dean Acheson, who observed: “Great Britain has lost an empire and has not yet found a role.” Acheson’s words suggested not only uncertainty about Britain’s role but also its decline in international [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Gonna Get Me Some Cold War Relics

    • July 10, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 22 comments

    What with the massed ranks of analysts, defence journalists and coalition politicians gunning for those thousands of cold war relics we have sitting idle just waiting for the chop, it’s time to see what they mean. A cynic might think that getting rid of cold war relics is simply a smokescreen, hiding budget driven cuts behind a veil of forward [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Nick Harvey Opens His Mouth

    • July 8, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • 5 comments

    Some choice quotes from Nick Harvey MP speaking at the RUSI Future Maritime Operations Conference today. He starts by evoking the memory of Richard Haldane and his reforms in the early 1900′s, making reference to the fact that he was a liberal politician, lets brush over the fact that Lord Haldane became a Labour Party member in 1923 and served [...]

    continue reading »

     
     
  • Upcoming FDR (LAND) Posts

    • July 6, 2010
    • By Think Defence
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • 3 comments

    Whilst we are still discussing FRES SV, a quick heads up for some of the articles/posts coming up Air defence Indirect fire and air land integration Close combat (inc small arms) Base infrastructure Logistics Communications Strategy and Learning & Development of Doctrine Combat Engineering Integrating civilian aid into the military matrix Has anyone got any more subject ideas?

    continue reading »

     
     
 

« Older Entries

 

Recent Posts

  • Industrial and Technology Matters
  • Consultants on Five Grand a Day at the MoD
  • Parliamentary Answers – to 2nd February 2012
  • A Swarm if Ideas
  • Has the Fat Lass Finished the Chrous
  • A Good Use of 17 Minutes and 22 Seconds
  • UK Military Bridging – Equipment (Medium Girder Bridge)
  • Learning Lessons from Libya, ISR and Maritime Land Attack
  • Parliamentary Answers – to 26th January 2011
  • 1 Yorks on Patrol
  • Multi Role Brigades
  • Nigeria
  • Now Thats a Rocket
  • The Bottomless Black Hole
  • Parliametary Answers – to 24th Jan 2012
 

Advert

 

Search Think Defence

 

Recent Comments

  • John Hartley on Cased Telescoping Ammunition Updatechrisb I am starting to wonder if the light cartridge could be lighter, Knight Armament 6x35 comes to mind. In
  • SomewhatRemoved on Learning Lessons from Libya, ISR and Maritime Land AttackFor the less ignorant, Type 45 carries the Ultra MFS-7000 active bow mounted sonar and has enough weapons for Lynx
  • SomewhatRemoved on Learning Lessons from Libya, ISR and Maritime Land Attackx, I really can't come back at your comments, sorry, because your approach seems so fundamentally divorced from the reality
  • Observer on Learning Lessons from Libya, ISR and Maritime Land AttackThis is also why I'm a fan of using LHDs for anti-piracy, low intensity operations, it leaves the Navy battleline
  • Observer on Learning Lessons from Libya, ISR and Maritime Land AttackEmbarked Marine detachment? In a serious situation, I'd rather lose a marine than someone expensively trained. I'd also rather have
  • x on Learning Lessons from Libya, ISR and Maritime Land Attack@ ACC I am talking about actions like freeing the PoWs from the Altmark cutlasses drawn. @ James Yes my
  • James on Learning Lessons from Libya, ISR and Maritime Land Attack@ X re naval training. Yes I do. I appreciate that sailors are not meant to be fully trained infantrymen,
  • ArmChairCivvy on Learning Lessons from Libya, ISR and Maritime Land AttackHi x, Which Narvik are you talking about? The Germans would have been squarely beaten, had the ships' companies from
 

Upcoming Posts

  • A Typhoon Future
  • Leafblowers, Talisman and Old Ideas
  • Quick Links
  • The Future of the British Army – Expeditionary Air Locations
  • The Trident Replacement and Submarine Fleet
  • The Future of the British Army – Fuel and Power
  • A Modern Day WOMBAT
  • Throw it off the ramp
  • Containers and Modules
  • Another Look at Mulberry

Subscribe to Think Defence Don't miss it - Subscribe by RSS.

 
 
 
  • Delve into Think Defence
  • Revolving Doors
  • Categories
  • Open Threads
  • Comments
  •  

WPZOOMDesigned by

Copyright © 2012 Think Defence. All rights reserved.