Think Defence
 
  • Delve into Think Defence
    • Tag Map
    • Links
    • Archives
    • About
    • Contact
  • Revolving Doors
  • Categories
    • Land, Sea and Air
    • Business and Politics
    • Thoughts on the Future
    • History, Humour and Culture
    • News, Images, Videos and Brochures
    • Think Defence Admin and Updates
  • Open Threads
    • Open Thread – Land, Sea and Air
    • Open Thread – Rumble in the CVF Jungle
    • Open Thread – Politics and Business
    • Open Thread – Humour and History
    • Open Thread – Anything Else
    • Open Thread (old)
    • Open Thread II (old)
  • Comments
  •  

Home » Open Thread – Anything Else

Open Thread – Anything Else

 

47 Comments

  1. ArmChairCivvy says:
    November 10, 2011 at 7:24 am

    There was this one-man review of Cyprus bases, but never saw anything published.

    What, other than a few planes and two boats will be left when
    2nd Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment (2 R ANGLIAN) to move from Cyprus to RAF Cottesmore in Rutland in July 2012.

    2nd Battalion The Yorkshire Regiment (2 YORKS) to move from Cyprus to Elizabeth Barracks, Pirbright in July 2013.

    … or is part of this just normal rotation?

  2. Phil says:
    November 10, 2011 at 8:19 am

    Normal rotation. Not heard of the UN mission ending or bases being handed back.

  3. ArmChairCivvy says:
    November 10, 2011 at 8:33 am

    Thought so. Perhaps with A-stan winding down (??) the over-the-horizon reserve will be withdrawn
    - I wouldn’t, if you compare an available bn to what can presently be put on amphibs

  4. ArmChairCivvy says:
    November 14, 2011 at 10:15 pm

    The news piece (15 Sept)covering the nomination of the first Commander of JFC included this line
    “Decisions on the initial composition of the JFC and location of the headquarters are expected in October.”
    - have I missed something? Or still in the “works”?

  5. ArmChairCivvy says:
    November 22, 2011 at 6:25 pm

    This one?

    ”
    The MOD will publish a fully funded and balanced ten-year Equipment Plan by September 2011, and the National Audit Office will conduct an affordability audit of this; the first of its kind.”

    - from a reliable source: http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/DefenceNews/DefencePolicyAndBusiness/DefenceEquipmentBudgetRisesAsFutureForceTakesShape.htm

  6. ArmChairCivvy says:
    December 1, 2011 at 11:17 am

    It’s not only the RM that make fleeting visits
    http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/11/warships-gunships-spyplanes-somalia/

  7. jedibeeftrix says:
    December 1, 2011 at 11:33 am

    “The MOD will publish a fully funded and balanced ten-year Equipment Plan by September 2011, and the National Audit Office will conduct an affordability audit of this; the first of its kind.”

    Has this actually arrived yet?

  8. DominicJ says:
    December 1, 2011 at 1:34 pm

    http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/press_notice_home/1012/10121520.aspx
    http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/1012/major_projects_report_2011.aspx

    They look promising

  9. Gareth Jones says:
    December 9, 2011 at 2:00 pm

    I was doing some research on something else and came across this story/video:

    http://www.innovationnewsdaily.com/libyan-rebels-military-robot-2056/

    Cost-effective defence procurement?

  10. jedibeeftrix says:
    December 17, 2011 at 5:36 pm

    got a letter from the Assistant Head, Strategic Defence and Security Review Secretariat, on the subject of the sdsr and what ambitions it helps to realise:

    http://jedibeeftrix.wordpress.com/2011/12/17/letter-from-the-mod-what-are-the-forces-for-and-how-does-the-sdsr-achieve-this/

  11. Chris.B. says:
    December 19, 2011 at 7:06 am

    IMPORTANT!!! READ!!!!

    Sorry, I was just hoping that would catch people’s attention ;)

    Anyway, something quite significant has taken place. Kim Jong-Il has popped his clogs in North Korea.

    Most analysts agree that the North Koreans knew this was coming, hence the introduction of his son to the world and the measures taken to gradually transfer power to him. But there’s still a risk that a power struggle could kick off, or that the son could press for a minor military incident in order to assert his authority, so naturally the South Koreans are getting nervous and have put their armed forces on alert.

  12. Chris.B. says:
    December 19, 2011 at 7:39 am

    Just to update this quickly, western reporters on the ground in PyongYang are reporting gunfire and large troop movements. “Somethings not right” reported one experienced journalist.

  13. Chris.B. says:
    December 19, 2011 at 7:51 am

    Should have checked that more closely. In all cases above those reporters were relying on source information from inside North Korea, so it may or may not be good, and is completely unverifiable for now.

  14. ArmChairCivvy says:
    December 20, 2011 at 5:03 pm

    Away from North Korea… Osprey has been in a gunfight for the first time:
    “The Osprey wasn’t supposed to enter combat so lightly armed. Many other large rotorcraft have guns installed on their side doors in addition to a gun on the rear ramp, allowing them to lay down suppressive fire over a much wider arc. But the Osprey’s rotating nacelles block the sides, making door guns impossible and leaving it with just the ramp gun. To compensate, BAE Systems designed a plug-in belly turret fitted with a .30-caliber mini-gun. A crew chief controls the turret from a console inside the cabin. But the turret is heavy and unwieldy, and most squadrons opt not to use it.”
    - I was suggesting this kit for Merlin CSARing
    - Looks like Osprey SCAR credentials were only on paper (Speed, range…)for that particular role (or plenty of other aircraft, which then to match the speed would have to be fixed wing)

  15. All Politicians are the Same says:
    December 20, 2011 at 5:11 pm

    ACC

    A CSAR package generally has a lot of other AC in it. During OUP a CSAR package may have included, dependent who was on station at the time. 2 x AV8B from Kearsage or Garibaldi, 2 Pave hawks from Ocean or merlin from Gabladi backed up by a C2 asset, AWacs, Sea Kinf, merlin and possibly AH 64D.

  16. ArmChairCivvy says:
    December 23, 2011 at 10:36 pm

    One more unexplicable Gordon Brown decision unravelling:
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/8975866/Baroness-Ashtons-diplomatic-service-accused-of-basic-failings.html
    - should be closely integrated with defence policy,or v.v. but in two years have not even set up secure comms with national embassies around the world
    - talk about living in the Brussels bubble

  17. jedibeeftrix says:
    December 28, 2011 at 11:27 am

    @ Admin

    re. site design

    We really need the recent articles widget that used to sit in the top-right of the page, for there are too many global categories requiring far too much ‘effort’ to check for new content.

  18. ArmChairCivvy says:
    December 28, 2011 at 12:01 pm

    RE ” need the recent articles widget that used to sit in the top-right of the page, for there are too many global categories requiring far too much ‘effort’ to check for new content.”
    - at least a “quick fix” by having the forum open-thread comments/contributions show up on the “Comments” page? Otherwise those forum pages will become the preserve of the dedicated (and even then wading through them is tedious, as Jedi pointed out)

  19. Think Defence says:
    January 4, 2012 at 10:00 pm

    Have installed a new comment editing bit of software so can you give it a try?

  20. DominicJ says:
    January 4, 2012 at 10:19 pm

    boobies for editing

  21. DominicJ says:
    January 4, 2012 at 10:20 pm

    i cant edit on my phone.

  22. DominicJ says:
    January 5, 2012 at 9:19 am

    I’ll try to keep this one clean then

  23. DominicJ says:
    January 5, 2012 at 9:19 am

    Nope, no luck at work either

  24. DominicJ says:
    January 6, 2012 at 6:31 pm

    Can we have a “hot topics” tab, to go with “recent posts” and “recent comments”?

    Please sir, I want some more

  25. Topman says:
    January 7, 2012 at 5:45 pm

    TD could we have the time stamp back for the comments both the little box and the comments page?

  26. jedibeeftrix says:
    January 13, 2012 at 4:06 pm

    i was asked to promote this link:

    http://labourfriendsoftheforces.org.uk/resettlement-consultation/

    it may be of interest to the TD service crowd.

  27. Think Defence says:
    January 15, 2012 at 4:31 pm

    Haven’t fell of the end of the world by the way, just a bit busy with other things and om currently overseas.

    Just finished the last couple of posts in the bridging series and then I think its back on the the Future of series

    Sorry for the delays

  28. x says:
    January 15, 2012 at 4:36 pm

    You haven’t missed much. Me and Chris B(AE) have weaponised Phil and flogged him to the Saudis. But apart form its been quiet. :)

  29. Chris.B. says:
    January 15, 2012 at 5:41 pm

    Japan deal in the works. As soon as we crack the harpoon situation.

    And I cant believe the Chick-Phil-A gag didn’t get a better response. I know it’s a fairly obscure reference to a less well known American Fast Food chain, but c’mon!

  30. x says:
    January 15, 2012 at 5:52 pm

    The US has never invaded a country that has a Chick-Phil-A branch. True.

  31. jedibeeftrix says:
    January 17, 2012 at 9:33 am

    nordic military cooperation:

    http://politiken.dk/newsinenglish/ECE1509688/swedish-military-wants-nordic-cooperation/

  32. Gabriele says:
    January 17, 2012 at 10:01 am

    My recent analysis on the new US strategy and its impact on the UK and NATO. http://ukarmedforcescommentary.blogspot.com/2012/01/new-us-defense-strategy-cuts-uk.html

    Land forces lose, Air and Navy gain, as expected.

    Also, little update with some of Hammond’s statements from the US. http://ukarmedforcescommentary.blogspot.com/2012/01/philip-hammond-from-us.html

  33. ArmChairCivvy says:
    January 17, 2012 at 10:01 am

    Hi Jedi,

    Thanks for the Nordic link (even though the headline was bigger than the actual story). Basically the proposal was about Nordic-wide incident management (including shooting down rogue airplanes or boarding suspect ships)as the area overall is huge and it is all done on a national basis now, ie. a good deal of it double.

    Not to forget that there already is deep co-operation
    - at the procurement level, including keeping the manufacturing of basic munitions going
    - at the EU BGs level(ireland remembered their Norse roots and joined!)
    - and in ISAF the Finnish-Swedish contingent being practically one

    Alex Salmond has made these “Nordic” noises about defence, but has not given them any concrete content.
    - Scotland independent or not, there should be the same kind of incident management joint area as proposed by the Swedes for the Nordic area
    - the other potential members have so many assets available that the effect on the availability of RN resources elsewhere can only be beneficial (not that there would be many, other than the protection of off-shore assets, in the area today)

  34. Topman says:
    January 17, 2012 at 10:31 am

    Redundacies announced today 1000 in the RAF, 3000 in the army and 300 in the rn. People have the next couple of months to apply. Looks like it will be the last round for the rn and the raf.

  35. ArmChairCivvy says:
    January 22, 2012 at 12:15 pm

    Time for a joke http://realwebworth.com/www.thinkdefence.co.uk
    - got to this one by going in again through the search engine (sometimes much faster than waiting the site to refresh)

  36. Think Defence says:
    January 24, 2012 at 8:14 pm

    Wow, where do I sign up for a sale

    Off any topics this caught my eye for something impressive and equally infuriating and depressing at the same times

    http://www.theengineer.co.uk/in-depth/analysis/rethinking-the-ambulance/1011491.article

  37. Think Defence says:
    February 8, 2012 at 1:52 pm

    Just a quick heads up for everyone

    Have decided to moderate comments a little more closely

    This place is starting to become an unpleasant place and I am not going to allow that to happen after all the hard work I have and continue to put in.

    As you might have seen from some of my recent comments, patience is starting wear thin

    Fair warning and all that

  38. James says:
    February 16, 2012 at 7:00 am

    This is interesting: historical overview of putting societies onto a war footing. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01bpkjn

    Original taster article from the BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17011607

  39. jackstaff says:
    February 16, 2012 at 7:46 am

    James,

    Very nice piece. Have you read much Richard Overy? Not just his “Why The Allies Won” but some of the follow-on work. Think you’d enjoy it.

    PS,
    You and x’s cross-talk in the Typhoon/Rafale thread ref: groceries (important to a war footing, in an academic bit of a past life I did some Public Record Office grunt work on rationing and commodity controls) made me pine for Waitrose, wallet-buggering though it is. Out here in the northwest corner of North America it looks like a wet spring, but hopefully that’ll bring in the wine grapes over our north-facing fence like last year so I can start a second batch of Chateau des Mademoiselles (what else do you call your private label when you have four daughters?)

  40. jedibeeftrix says:
    February 16, 2012 at 4:41 pm

    good one from the Offshore Balancer:

    http://offshorebalancer.wordpress.com/2012/02/12/the-tyranny-of-distance/

  41. x says:
    February 19, 2012 at 7:08 pm

    A review of the Track T800 CDi diesel (yes, diesel) motorcycle. Still not convinced. Perhaps if they had a look at a Ural AWD sidecar outfit and see if they can come up with something similar…

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/motorbikes/9088717/Track-T800-CDi-review.html

  42. x says:
    February 19, 2012 at 7:48 pm

    http://cgblog.org/2012/02/04/why-i-choose-the-gun/

  43. McZ says:
    February 21, 2012 at 11:34 am

    Dunno where to ask that question, but seems to be valid here.

    Any thoughts about this one
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/internet/9090617/Phone-and-email-records-to-be-stored-in-new-spy-plan.html

    Another result of the messed-up security policy the SDSR is?

  44. Think Defence says:
    February 21, 2012 at 11:37 am

    Was that in the SDSR McZ, can’t remember.

    I can imagine that is going to be one gigantic database even though it is only for a year.

    Big brother is here

    Sven from Defense and Freedom takes a big interest in these issues

  45. ArmChairCivvy says:
    February 21, 2012 at 11:52 am

    The only limit is the size of storage as mentioned
    - already years ago the mob operators were placed under obligation to store who called whom (and from what “cell” mind you)
    - and the records were to be kept for 10 years! You can throw away your book keeping records after 7

  46. ArmChairCivvy says:
    February 21, 2012 at 12:21 pm

    Just when the EU privacy initiative gets to grips with Google and Facebook who have done this, from foreign soil, “And the huge databases could also be used by internet service providers, particularly to work out which advertising to target at users.
    Broadband firms including BT came up with a scheme almost three years ago to target advertising, but it did not get off the ground.”
    for years, we then follow the UAE and Indonesia who thought (and got a lot critique for it)that it was not OK for a foreign comms provider to give terrorists an instant and encrypted communication channel on their soil, without their sovereignty extending to the servers where encryption can be undone… on the need-to-know basis; obviously there is a cost to it

    BTW, I hadn’t realised the 10 year mandatory retention period had fallen flat on its face (there is still a period for which those records are kept)

  47. Observer says:
    February 21, 2012 at 12:26 pm

    TD, no worries about Big Brother. :)

    There was an idea for this in Singapore, extending to even phone conversations, and it is still ongoing, but one thing people found out very fast is that a few million people spamming and talking equals to a massive case of info-overload. No living person could possible go through that mess to extract anything meaningful for future plans. You could talk about blowing up the US embassy and it’ll probably get lost in the background mess.

    What these records are good for, and the only reason we’re still keeping them, is forensics. You can’t get future plans out of that mess, but once something happens, you can backtrack on a specific trail and ignore the rest to reconstruct events.

    So, no Big Brother, more like CSI-Post Disaster Reconstruction.

Leave a Comment

 

Click here to cancel reply.




 
 

Recent Posts

  • First UK F35C Flight
  • Labour Launch Defence Review
  • That’ll be the Daewoo
  • The reality of the challenges involved in recapturing the Falkland Islands
  • Whatever happened to them Gucci ladders?
  • BAE Systems Ground Combat Vehicle
  • The Price of an F35
  • 81mm Precision Mortars
  • Rank Inflation – Am More Confused Than Ever
  • The Royal National Lifeboat Institution
  • Rank Inflation – Perceptions
  • One Year After Libya, the Anglo French love in continues
  • Lightweight Multirole Missile
  • A balanced force with a balanced budget ?
  • Vehicle Protection
 

Advert

 

Search Think Defence

 

Recent Comments

  • James on The reality of the challenges involved in recapturing the Falkland IslandsObserver, you've got a single infantry company. Pick the right time of day and you can guarantee many will be
  • solomon on First UK F35C Flightoh and don't laugh. the Israeli's are pushing for a two seat model.
  • Chris Werb on The reality of the challenges involved in recapturing the Falkland Islands@Observer Funny you should say that. Late in the Falklands conflict the Argentines were adapting the Pucara to carry an
  • solomon on First UK F35C FlightF-35F block 60? bigger engines and some canards?
  • Mr.fred on BAE Systems Ground Combat VehicleThe Bushmaster 30/40 is chambered for 30x173mm but Atk and GD OTS have been developing a 40x180 (actually about 39x180)
  • ArmChairCivvy on That’ll be the DaewooThere may be 10 kt between them http://www.defpro.com/news/details/32660/?SID=f5303fc3fef14be038575b5623b1d2d9 http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Ships/Active/209-Fleet-Tanker.html but otherwise I can only spot - better boat handling facilities
  • James on The reality of the challenges involved in recapturing the Falkland IslandsX, see page 16 of the link I posted at 1904. Not insurmountable.
  • Observer on The reality of the challenges involved in recapturing the Falkland Islands@x LOL seriously good one there mate! If it came to just shooting cross the bows though, then does it
 

Upcoming Posts

  • Springer, When UOR’s Go Bad
  • Quick Links
  • A Combat Service Support Corps
  • The Future of the British Army – Expeditionary Air Locations
  • Water Water Everywhere
  • Army Communications
  • Another Look at Pluto
  • A Soft Maritime Underbelly
  • What next for Challenger, is the tank actually dead this time?
  • The Logistic Support Cycle

Subscribe to Think Defence Don't miss it - Subscribe by RSS.

 
 
 
  • Delve into Think Defence
  • Revolving Doors
  • Categories
  • Open Threads
  • Comments
  •  

WPZOOMDesigned by

Copyright © 2012 Think Defence. All rights reserved.