About The Author

Think Defence hopes to start sensible conversations about UK defence issues, no agenda or no campaign but there might be one or two posts on containers, bridges and mexeflotes!

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
April 1, 2014 9:41 am

OT As in not RAF Related…

http://www.janes.com/article/36157/thales-unveils-new-hull-mounted-and-towed-sonar-systems-for-opvs

Any use? Get more value out of the upcoming OPV’s…

April 1, 2014 10:09 am

Beard Away, the missing link – http://www.dutchdefencepress.com/?p=12173

The Other Chris
April 1, 2014 10:15 am

01/04/2014?

The Other Chris
April 1, 2014 1:17 pm

Did x and Not a Boffin manage to get up and running with Disqus in the end?

Engineer Tom
April 1, 2014 5:28 pm

MOD have announced that HMS Tireless has deployed to the Southern Ocean for the search for MH370. What happened to never saying where subs were, especially when there is a large Chinese presence, not saying it shouldn’t be there but why tell people unless you find something.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
April 1, 2014 5:31 pm

http://www.army.mod.uk/news/26220.aspx

First of the “new” Adaptable Force Brigades.

Enigma
Enigma
April 1, 2014 5:58 pm

I see we have had to use a library picture of an RAF aircraft for its birthday pic TD is that because they’ve banned cameras at hq ?

Challenger
Challenger
April 1, 2014 6:11 pm

‘Southern Ocean’ Not exactly precise coordinates is it!

Challenger
Challenger
April 1, 2014 6:18 pm

Nice! Looks like a name change and not much else at the moment.

Observer
Observer
April 1, 2014 6:48 pm

As the people doing MPA SAR in the “Southern Ocean” are currently finding out, it’s not a coordinate at all. More like a wish and a prayer.

Challenger
Challenger
April 1, 2014 7:07 pm

I was cheekily suggesting that making it public we have deployed an SSN doesn’t really matter when contrasted with the vast area currently concerned.

The Other Chris
April 1, 2014 7:29 pm

Tireless? She’s in the “Southern Ocean”. Honest.

Gloomy Northern Boy
Gloomy Northern Boy
April 1, 2014 11:15 pm

x indicated that he wasn’t intending too, but perhaps if he still follows the site we may yet hear the welcome cry of “build more ships! build more ships!” eventually – not sure about NaB i’m afraid…

Challenger
Challenger
April 2, 2014 12:33 am

Always sad to see good chaps fall by the wayside. Disqus is ridiculously easy to set-up though. Hopefully we will see them back on here one day…

wf
wf
April 2, 2014 10:21 am
April 2, 2014 2:36 pm

More Gibraltar shenanigans

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26856277

Kent Horton
April 2, 2014 3:17 pm

“Hong Kong Tower, PanAm One-Three-Six. Don’t want to alarm anyone, but it looks like one of those little RAF fighters just blew up.”

April 2, 2014 4:19 pm

Bye-Bye An-70?

I am unsure where the prototypes are…and am pretty sure Russia could develop it on its own if it wanted too… still, France, take note.

http://www.defensenews.com/article/20140402/DEFREG01/304020020/Ukraine-Halts-Arms-Exports-Russia

Steve Jones
Steve Jones
April 2, 2014 4:30 pm

No thanks…nice dedicated ASICs thanks. That way, when the software driving the huge multifunction array folds and throws its hand in, we dont lose the radar, jammers, tdl’s and wider comms all in a oner.

WiseApe
April 2, 2014 4:33 pm

I imagine the Spanish Ambassador will be entitled to his own parking space at the FO at this rate. Security probably just wave him through – which would be ironic.

Z
April 2, 2014 6:59 pm
Kent Horton
Kent Horton
April 2, 2014 9:07 pm

“Hong Kong Tower, PanAm One-Three-Six. Don’t want to alarm anyone, but it looks like one of those little RAF fighters just blew up.”

Or,…

“Now you’ve done it, Reggie!”

http://www.airliners.net/photo/De-Havilland-(F+W/0860511/L/

Repulse
April 2, 2014 9:27 pm

PE: Interesting that according to the Torygraph HIS Tireless was in Gibraltar on the 2nd April… isn’t it in the Indian Ocean?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/spain/10739785/Unlawful-and-dangerous-Spanish-ships-stray-into-British-controlled-water-off-Gibraltar.html

April 3, 2014 4:09 am
Chris.B.
April 3, 2014 6:05 am

There’s been another shooting at Fort Hood; http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-26863033

wf
wf
April 3, 2014 7:11 am

Don’t tell me, they still ban the carriage of guns by service personnel there. Make the US Army safer!

PS Thank fuck Disqus is gone :-)

April 3, 2014 7:28 am

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-26860278

I hope she knows where to stick that new note of hers…

Mark
Mark
April 3, 2014 12:37 pm

http://m.scotsman.com/news/uk/boeing-p-8-poseidon-tops-nimrod-replacement-list-1-3362426

Squadron Leader Lloyd Barrett said the Boeing P-8 Poseidon “is the most capable” option but also “the most expensive” and revealed that the Airbus Military C295 and Bombardier Dash are the other off the shelf options being considered to replace the Nimrod which was cancelled in 2010 by the coalition government because of safety concerns.

Chris
Chris
April 3, 2014 12:54 pm

Mike – you have to laugh at Kirchner’s politicking – like her poking the UK in the eye about 20% youth unemployment when, funnily enough, Argentina has 20% youth unemployment itself: http://peacechild.org/youth-unemployment-in-argentina/ Anyway with the rate of inflation there* the new note will be scrap paper within the decade so it will soon pass out of public awareness.

*Wiki stats give 60% inflation over the past 12 months.

April 3, 2014 1:02 pm

@ Chris

Indeed! Throwing rocks in glass houses…

x
x
April 3, 2014 2:58 pm

I can’t remember if posted this back in January…….

The MN are replacing the BATRAL-class landing ship with 3 new ships for £85,000,000 of this design,

http://www.janes.com/article/32202/france-orders-three-new-multimission-vessels

Les BATRALS are deployed to the French empire’s more distant areas in support of local administration.

It is a shame that the new ships won’t be able to do this………

and won’t have a nice clear flightdeck…….

Some more links showing comparable ships…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HNLMS_Pelikaan_(A804)

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contramaestre_Casado_(A-01)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lublin-class_minelayer-landing_ship

Frenchie
Frenchie
April 3, 2014 3:23 pm

These are small ships to fight against drug traffickers. Nothing important.

The Other Chris
April 3, 2014 3:28 pm

@x

Interesting!

Did you catch the news on the new UT 777 from Rolls-Royce? Ice strengthened, Moon Pool… the structure on the rear is currently an enclosed work area for the drilling rig.

http://www.rolls-royce.com/news/press_releases/2014/27012014_island_Offshore.jsp

Kent Horton
Kent Horton
April 3, 2014 3:45 pm

@x, @Frenchie, @The Other Chris – If it’s just a small ship to fight against drug traffickers, I’d take one of these:

Skjold-class Coastal Corvette, Royal Norwegian Navy

Observer
Observer
April 3, 2014 3:48 pm

Kent, when they say “fight” against drug traffickers, they don’t mean shoot on sight. :P

The Other Chris
April 3, 2014 3:52 pm

“I enjoy being in America: it’s fun, you know, because you have, you have so many things we never had in Russia — like warning shots.”

– Yakov Smirnoff

x
x
April 3, 2014 4:27 pm

@ TOC

When I say that covered drill tower I started wondering about top weights margins and phased arrays and cheap diesel RADAR pickets armed with SeaCeptor and then I took my meds. There is lots of volume aft. Look at the price compared to what the MN are getting. I am going have to look up the spec’s now and compare them to those River replacements. :(

(Not saying that is optimum just a “visual”. That uptake/drill head shroud area is just such an attention grabber. It is easy to imagine the exterior covered in phase arrays etc. a la………

@ Ken Horton

The BATRAL have done stirling work for the French in their overseas departments moving stuff about. As well as the BATRAL there is normally one or two patrol vessels on station too.

My favourite Skywegiuan SES hunt slower game…….

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oks%C3%B8y_class_mine_hunter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alta_class_mine_sweeper

Good compromise for route surveillance between a helicopter and MCMV. Especially if your country operates SSBN like we do……..

Kent
Kent
April 3, 2014 4:31 pm

@Observer – On one hand I could say, “Only if they refuse to heave to upon warning.” On the other hand, I could say, “Why not?” And, in the interest of working in a “law-enforcement” mode, we could remove the 8 Kongsberg Naval Strike Missile SSMs kept in an internal weapons bay and put a manned*, twin 35mm turret on it.

*(The turret could be operated remotely in a combat situation, but in “law-enforcement” mode it helps to have a human finger on the trigger.)

The Other Chris
April 3, 2014 4:37 pm

From Marinelink.com: http://www.marinelink.com/news/rollsroyce-develops363423.aspx

The vessel’s main particulars:

Design: Rolls-Royce UT 777 CD
Length: Approx. 168.8 m
Moulded breadth: 28.0 m
Moulded depth: 11.7 m
Positioning Capability: DP3
Ice class: ICE1B
Accommodation: 91 persons

Rolls-Royce [to] supply:

– Design and Engineering Package
– 4 Bergen Diesel Generator Engines (Type B 32:40L9ACD, 4190 eKW @ 720 rpm)
– 2 Bergen Diesel Generator Engines (Type B 32:40V12ACD, 5587 eKW @ 720 rpm)
– 2 Rolls-Royce ”Super Silent” side thrusters
– 3 Azimuth Thruster System (stern) and 2 Azimuth Thruster Retractable System (bow)
– Helicon x 3 Propulsion control system
– Rolls-Royce Deck machinery package, including Windlass/Mooring winch, Chain stoppers, 2 Mooring winches Aft, 3 Hydraulic pump units
– 1 Cargorail crane CRC 150-2-7TE, 19m
– Bulk Handling System, Total 202 m3
– Automation Package, including Rolls-Royce Automation system (ACON), Control Consoles, Emergency Telegraphs, Electrical Test Panel, Low voltage system.

I was also allowing the imagination to wander about the structure’s (or a replacement structure) uses. A “Mission Deck” with a ramp from the helipad as an option to hangar maybe?

All sorts of goodness possible.

You’re completely right about the price ranges being discussed.

EDIT:

Oh, and the class resembles the great (Great?) British Liners to me.

All Politicians are the Same
All Politicians are the Same
April 3, 2014 4:43 pm

@TOC

So other than the huge RCS, massive IR profile and near 12M draught it would be useful :)

Look at the Braunschweig Class Corvette picture at the link. Her exhaust gases are vented at the black area midships low on the hull then compare it to the RR design venting lovely come and kill me energy straight up.

http://articles.maritimepropulsion.com/article/German-corvette-OLDENBURG-commissioned-MTU-power-selected-5649.aspx

Observer
Observer
April 3, 2014 4:47 pm

@Kent

“Woops, my finger slipped.” :P
I’d go with a 40mm AGL if you asked me to design an interceptor. More flexibility. Tear gas round into the cabin tends to make people bail out of vehicles fast for some reason and tagging someone with paint rounds can make it easier to identify anyone who got away. Beanbags for non-lethal solutions.

x
x
April 3, 2014 4:51 pm

@ TOC

Not the optimum configuration. But in terms of steel and engines and power and hotel services a lot of ship for £25m

All Politicians are the Same
All Politicians are the Same
April 3, 2014 5:09 pm

@TD

No I have not but it is a good thing on many levels. The Greek Super Vita Class can vent under water :)

Kent
Kent
April 3, 2014 5:44 pm

@Observer – You could mount a Mk 19 40mm AGL on one of the .50 Cal mounts and still keep the twin light cannon mount aft of the superstructure. See how reasonable I’m being? But, after all, they’re drug traffickers.

Actually, I’d like to see a batch of these operating in the Persian Gulf to handle “the assymetric threat” of swarming small boat attacks. Wouldn’t those Iranian FIACs of the Revolutionary Guard be surprised when they can’t run away from one?

The Other Chris
April 3, 2014 6:39 pm

@x

I think that’s just the RR portion of the contract to be fair.

@APATS

Excellent! It’s a go-er then!

In all seriousness, from the descriptions, I read that entire rear structure and the tower as completely replaceable with a structure of your choice. Vents/exhausts/uptakes routed accordingly.

I’m interested in the design from a personal curiosity side though. It’s… different.

Kent
Kent
April 3, 2014 7:27 pm

@x – The BATRAL looks like a great ship for showing the flag and being able to provide not only a sea-borne presence but to put a significant force shore as well. Something of that class/type would certainly have a place in my “fantasy fleet.” It was Frenchie that brought up the drug traffickers!

The Alta and Oksøy classes look good, too, and would definitely have a place, but I like the go-fast machines with guns!

Observer
Observer
April 4, 2014 9:09 am

http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/resourcelibrary/cyberpioneer/topics/articles/news/2014/mar/07mar14_news.print.img.html

Dropped the ball last month on this which might interest UK readers, it’s confirmed, our new AAR platform is the Airbus A-330 MRTT, 6 units. What’s also interesting is the study for a new “LST” which somehow seems to be describing a LHA considering that the current “LST” LPD is described as “limited in carrying capacity” and “needs more helicopters”. ST Marine already has an Endurance 180 paper design, but if BAE can come up with mature working solutions, there is a chance of snatching the deal away from what is essentially a powerpoint/autocad presentation. After all, paper design is one thing, people who have built working examples of the ship in question is another.

There is also mention of an IFV upgrade program, which implies an upgunning, as well as doubling the number of platforms. CTA might be interested in that. 15 year program, lots of time to plan.

Frenchie
Frenchie
April 4, 2014 10:27 am

I found what they will serve, the new ships will be used in support of a naval force, accompanying a carrier battle group or amphibious group for towing ships or submarines, rescue, fight against maritime pollution and waterway police.

Simon
April 4, 2014 10:45 am

Observer,

I’d suggest you guys should look at Rotterdam (Enforcer) and think S70 instead of NH90.

Observer
Observer
April 4, 2014 11:21 am

Simon, we shall see, 15 years is a long time, give 2 years to cut steel, it’s still 13 years to look around.

The Other Chris
April 4, 2014 12:02 pm

It really is looking like we’ll go for a P-8x/MQ-4C option as an MPA choice given the sheer investment in training and cooperation:

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/uk-details-collaboration-on-p-8-triton-platforms-397835/

I suppose it’s likely not all one way either, guaranteed our Nimrod trained crews were able to feed back to the USN and others.

EDIT:

Four crew involved in the early testing and training of Triton at Maryland to work on the introduction to service given likelihood of limited spots is significant.

The Other Chris
April 4, 2014 12:38 pm

@TD

Come across any sonobouy launchers, pods or gliding Stingray kits to mount on the external mounts? ;)

Mark
Mark
April 4, 2014 5:07 pm

http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/awx_04_04_2014_p0-677176.xml

The head of the U.K. Military Aviation Authority (MAA) has expressed concerns over a lack of suitably qualified and experienced personnel across the U.K. military aviation community.

He notes that the airborne collision of two Tornado GR4s over the Moray Firth back in July 2012, in which three personnel died, is likely to lead to a Scottish Fatal Accident Inquiry.

The report also confirms that several aircraft types—including the AgustaWestland AW159 Wildcat and the Thales Watchkeeper UAV—were grounded during test flying toward entry into service, but does not elaborate on the reasons why and when the groundings took place. However, the report also points out that the army has taken considerable steps in enhancing UAV operations—in readiness for Watchkeeper—by aligning its UAV operating responsibilities with the U.K. Joint Helicopter Command, a decision made after a damning report into the loss of a leased-in Hermes 450 UAV in Afghanistan.

x
x
April 4, 2014 5:50 pm

@ TOC

Yes. The design is interesting for all sorts of reasons. It was the layout that caught my eye more than specifics such as the ship’s draught; for example the flightdeck arrangement and other styling ques. Seeing fresh designs adds to the understanding of ship design. And though ships are designed for specific purposes in certain spheres it doesn’t mean design aspects can’t be transferred and modify for different purposes. That is to say I don’t think anybody was really suggesting we buy the RR design for the RN; though I suppose it helps some to reinforce their ego by trotting out the obvious concerning the vessel’s spec’s. One of the reasons why I try not to post here (too much.) We should be glad that Britain is a front runner in ship design if not building.

@ Kent

Back before the (supposed) retreat back from East of Suez the RN. the Army, MoT/MoS, and RFA all at some point operated numbers of small landing ship (LST/ LCT). Roughly grouped in the Gulf (and SE Asia), the Med, and Northern Europe. Once there was more to GB’s amphibious warfare capability than the RM skiing around Norway with their Dutch friends. I still think it is a capability we should retain but I don’t there’s any interest. You would think the Army would be up for anything that mentioned tanks but alas not. The ability to move outsize loads across the beach in useful chunks isn’t something to be sniffed at; especially seeing as we the West will probably have sea control and air superiority, why fight for a port when you don’t have to? The Turks are buying new LCT not just to counter their Greek opponents.

Kent
Kent
April 4, 2014 6:16 pm

@Mark – “The head of the U.K. Military Aviation Authority (MAA) has expressed concerns over a lack of suitably qualified and experienced personnel across the U.K. military aviation community.”

Gee, I wonder who is to blame? Is the MAA in charge of qualification standards?

Brian Black
Brian Black
April 4, 2014 9:35 pm

http://www.telam.com.ar/movil/notas/201404/57679-cristina-malvinas-es-la-base-militar-de-la-otan-en-el-atlantico-sur.html

“the truth about the Falklands is that it is the nuclear military base of NATO in the South Atlantic. This is the truth that cannot keep hiding”

(“la verdad sobre Malvinas es que constituye la base militar nuclear de la OTAN en el Atlántico Sur. Esta es la verdad que no pueden seguir ocultando”)

Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner continuing to suffer her delusions.

x
x
April 4, 2014 9:48 pm

“the truth about the Falklands is that it is the nuclear military base of NATO in the South Atlantic. This is the truth that cannot keep hiding”

Rhubarb! The truth is out there, over here, over the top, over sold, over the hill, over the rainbow, over the rainbow, wow double rainbow, over before it started, overground underground Wombling free…..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCJSKhtTtC0

DISCLAIMER: I have an interest in the history of computing especially British computing of the late 1950s to the purchase of ICL by Fujitsu. This was flagged up to me due to the Computer Weekly connection. Can’t say much more………..

Obsvr
April 5, 2014 12:30 am

“the truth about the Falklands is that it is the nuclear military base of NATO in the South Atlantic. This is the truth that cannot keep hiding”

Which planet is she on? Do Argentines actually believe this sort of tosh?

ArmChairCivvy
ArmChairCivvy
April 5, 2014 8:34 am

Now, an opposed landing onto the Malvinas might benefit from this type of config on existing hovercraft… It is like 4 Apaches hovering side by side and using their cannons that level 4 feet of concrete in seconds

http://m.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1998-01/connecting-land-and-sea

It is a pity that the deepskirt LCAC project was cancelled as it included armouring up, to be able to minesweep for landings under fire, and take moderate hits. They did transfer the technology to another country, though, who built a prototype.

ArmChairCivvy
ArmChairCivvy
April 5, 2014 9:04 am

This could go onto the tank thread, but perhaps is too close to trivia.

Both Sweden and Switzerland Built prototypes with a 140 mm cannon,before going for Leos. Sweden had a whole new tank and the Swiss just a turret (for Leo, anyway).
– has anyone, anywhere actually adopted that gun?

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
April 5, 2014 12:04 pm

“the truth about the Falklands is that it is the nuclear military base of NATO in the South Atlantic. This is the truth that cannot keep hiding”

Nuts. One can make out most of the infrastructure of the Falklands just by looking on Google Earth, not too many Coulport style security features. Only one I can see, and its not nuclear.

Maybe it is our greatest underground base, invisible on the surface. And maybe the Strategic Reserve is actually hidden under MPA?

Even if it was, so what? UK can place assets ( whats left of them ) where it wants.

JohnHartley
JohnHartley
April 5, 2014 1:00 pm

ACC at one time there was talk of a Merkava with a 140mm gun. Do not know what happened to that. Had the Cold War kept going, British/US/German tanks would probably have a 135mm electrothermal gun by now. Some development work/experimentation was done at the time.

April 5, 2014 2:41 pm

I like Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner – wait hear me out.
Its national leaders like her (and Putin) who’s ranting will enable our military to at least be funded as it is , we might get all the Astute’s ,T26’s , Successor class designed and built etc .
God bless her for her delusions for thinking we would put land based nuclear weapons on the Falkland Islands where their very endangerment of capture by Argentinian military aggression towards the FALKLAND islands would bring about an un-balanced possibly disproportionate response on our part (half a dozen Storm Shadows levelling the Argentine Parliament buildings which would win us no friends in the region).The four Typhoons on the Islands ,however capable, could not stop a determined air assault landing well away from any ground based AAA which had not already been neutralized by the very capable Argentine special forces(their 1 year version of the USN SEALS course has a similar drop out rate of 95% with a good few of the soldiers dropping out due to a lack of a heartbeat).
Any way that’s why I like Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner and her printing of very pretty 50 pesos toilet paper and her accusations we have the impudence to put things that go bang on our own territory .

as
as
April 5, 2014 2:55 pm

Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner you have to wonder if she is compensating for something?
Does she not feel Argentinian enough so has to play to the nationalists.
Her family has no history in Argentina because her father is Spanish and her mother German.
It make you question her motives. It also makes her remarks about the 11th generation Falkland islander even more funny when under her premise she would have to go back to Spain or Germany as a child of the occupation.

We do in need as many nutty world leaders as we can to get for funding.
The question is how many of though nutty world leaders are willing to go to war?

as
as
April 5, 2014 3:14 pm

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?216522-Tank-Guns-of-Present-and-Future&s=aa39e8d603a2b3a87b3177c274fd5f32

Tank Guns of Present and Future..

So interesting ideas in various sizes.
I can not see anyone in the west going any bigger than 120mm for now any way.

x
x
April 5, 2014 3:24 pm

@ as

Modern politics is contrary isn’t it? On the one hand our political elites tell us the nation state doesn’t matter. And then when it suits them the nation state is all. Being able to swap, change, and ignore what I would think are pretty fundamental values is disingenuous and ultimately self-serving.

Miliband being the progeny of an illegal alien Communist duplicitous rapacious father (whose own father sold out his own people to a foreigner power) worries me than Clegg having a Dutch mother (even though like many firmly entrenched middle class women she despise class. Ho hum!)

Compare and contrast with dynastic Europe……..

x
x
April 5, 2014 6:27 pm

Further to the discussion on uptakes above……….

HMS Lincoln, a Salisbury class AD frigate…

and

HMS Exmouth trialling Olympus (note the huge hot plume of efflux)……..

and the Finnish Turunmaa-class gunboat Karjala,

the exhaust from the diesels and GT is trunked down the vessel’s and exits to the atmosphere just by the quarterdeck.

x
x
April 5, 2014 7:06 pm

And RFA Diligence “making smoke”…….

https://www.flickr.com/photos/ugborough_exile/3079677527/in/photostream/

and this shows the position of her uptakes……..

(Most distinct engine noise in the RFA fleet…….. :) )

JohnHartley
JohnHartley
April 5, 2014 8:59 pm

Re Prototype electrothermal tank guns, XM-291 & XM-360.

Red Trousers
Red Trousers
April 6, 2014 11:31 am

A thought. Is TD (the comments, not the person) becoming relentlessly equipment focused? Defence is about far more than kit, it is about national mindset, priorities, capability fusion, Allies and threats, demographics on a global scale, the differential velocities between technologies and cultures, resources, hard and soft power and many other things.

It might just be me, but increasingly I look at the title of a thread and think “the comments will be full of people banging on about their favourite wagon/ship/plane, and none of them will be able to see the wood from the trees”, and so don’t bother.

Kit has its’ place, but it is pretty marginal.

WiseApe
April 6, 2014 11:46 am
Gloomy Northern Boy
Gloomy Northern Boy
April 6, 2014 12:28 pm

@RT – As somebody interested in the politics and strategy of this not the kit I’m inclined to agree, but it seems to me that articles come in waves, like the Chinese at the Imjin River…I’m pretty confident that there will be a different wave along in due course…

GNB

ArmChairCivvy
ArmChairCivvy
April 6, 2014 12:45 pm

@wiseape,

The quote mentions a mock-up already paraded?

Found this on defencetalk… Should be rolling out from next year onwards:

It’s supposed to be a cheaper to produce variant of the Object 195, with probably tie ins from the features added to the T-90MS. So imagine an unmanned turret config, 2-3 man crew in either individual armored capsules or a single armored capsule for all, possibly a bustle-stored ammo rack with blow-out panels, panoramic sights, extremely advanced FCS, possibly French thermals (since Russian MIC doesn’t seem to have anything to offer, though it remains to be seen). Granted it’s all speculation, so I’d wait and see until they release something concrete.

Read more: http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/army-security-forces/russianland-forces-thread-11742/#ixzz2y6p8NAM7

The first Italian deal, for 700 of their Linxes has seen most undelivered, or not accepted. Would be nice to know what happened to Centauro, as the Russians were trialling them with three different guns?

And finally, the mortar vehicles able to fire while crew stays protected have had some dvlmnt difficulties, so there has been an enquiry for about 500+ AMOS units.

The last three mentioned are on wheels, but also on the tracked side only the MBT is 100% domestically designed & produced. The effective doubling of defence budget seems to be driven by other than defence industrial concerns?

ArmChairCivvy
ArmChairCivvy
April 6, 2014 12:55 pm

So only one tracked, the MBT, and new wheeled platforms tend to have foreign participation.
– talk about go-getters and hang-abouts in armour procurement!

Both the MBT and the IFV with unmanned turrets.

x
x
April 6, 2014 6:08 pm

@ RT

Equipment is just symbolic of our capacity to physically act upon or react to a given situation. We don’t know what situations may arise in the future but we do know (approximately) our capacity to react (force levels and equipment type). There is lot of discussion here on where those crisis may occur; for example I think capacity to act in the Indian Ocean is more important than capacity to act say in Central Asia others have other ideas. There is a lot of discussion here on international aid and its utility. There is discussion about industrial capacity here. I don’t think anybody here actually likes the idea of killing and our focus on equipment is just schoolboy fun. Lastly there is only so much time in the day, we are all not present all of the time, and we are a divers to discuss deeper topics in great detail. Some here sadly aren’t tolerant of views that diverge from their owns or don’t have the courage to stand away from the supposed norms. When I studied Security Studies the potential field of study was very wide and stretched from water to gender studies. I don’t think you would enjoy discussing some of the more abstract areas of SS because I think given your background you (and most here) would find them to be nonsensical irrelevances. That is why we end up talking about kit all the time.

El Sid
El Sid
April 6, 2014 6:54 pm

This on retention in the USN has been attracting some attention, people might want to think about the relevance on this side of the pond (not least – who would write/publish something like this in the UK?) :

http://blog.usni.org/2014/03/20/keep-a-weather-eye-on-the-horizon-a-navy-officer-retention-study

All Politicians are the Same
All Politicians are the Same
April 6, 2014 6:58 pm

@ El Sid

We have surveys and retention studies on an almost constant basis, with the more serious ones having dedicated teams. We just do not publish them on line.

x
x
April 7, 2014 11:44 am

Spidapex
Spidapex
April 7, 2014 12:41 pm
Red Trousers
Red Trousers
April 7, 2014 8:25 pm

The Chindits. As a concept, mad as a box of frogs or surprisingly still salient?

Just finished reading a small memoir of a distant by marriage relative. I was struck by his completely focused approach, which was that he didn’t expect to get out alive, so no point worrying about it, do the best he could in the time he had. The kit was shit, so no point worrying about it, and in any case, the Japanese kit was even shittier.

He did get out alive, perhaps luckily.

Could these attitudes even exist in today’s Armed Forces? No Service point scoring, as I think we’re all much the same now, softened by decades of peace and ever increasing expectations. Not just at the individual serviceman/woman level, but among our Commanders. The appetite for something like the Chindits would I think be non-existent these days.

DavidNiven
DavidNiven
April 7, 2014 8:37 pm

@x

Its a good job they are in the navy, from the first frame above I don’t think they are going to bother the enemy with their knowledge of small arms weapon handling ;-)

x
x
April 7, 2014 9:06 pm

@ DN

I thought it all a tad embarrassing. Nothing wrong with motos etc. and tradition. But invented mission statements? Shudders……..

DavidNiven
DavidNiven
April 7, 2014 9:10 pm

@x

It’s no worse than what we churn out here for all three services, it’s all stuff designed by media types to portray a nice message and if it works, who are we to complain :-)

All Politicians are the Same
All Politicians are the Same
April 7, 2014 9:25 pm

@X/DN

I quite like it, simple to the point and demonstrates pride in both their service and nation. My issue with the Kiwis is they cannot self sustain so personnel requiring more advanced courses are sent to Australia or here and they poach relentlessly.

Gloomy Northern Boy
Gloomy Northern Boy
April 7, 2014 9:25 pm

@RT – Wasn’t Viscount Slim a bit uneasy about the Chindits, and indeed elite units generally? It’s a while since I read the book…bloody awful war though…my Dad’s best pal lost an arm in it, but he was a tough old bugger… used to win amateur cycle road races for years after the war against younger men with a full complement of limbs…

GNB

DavidNiven
DavidNiven
April 7, 2014 9:31 pm

@APATS,

All recruitment videos are a bit cringe worthy, but seeing them for what they are comes with experience. Which comes a bit too late, after signing on the dotted line in some cases ;-)

x
x
April 7, 2014 9:33 pm
Red Trousers
Red Trousers
April 7, 2014 10:22 pm

GNB, re Slim. I think he was, although anecdotally from my distant relative’s memoir and from Regimental diaries of the time, I suspect that the Chindits themselves thought they were somewhat out of the ordinary, and certainly pre-selected by cap badge if not individually.

I feel that it was a shattering experience for those men who survived. Certainly Orde Wingate wrote of this, his deputy as well. The full panoply of PTSD (in modern terms) was exhibited post War. But yet little remarked. My own relative took his own life in the mid sixties, and while I have no psychiatric training whatsoever, his writing to me suggests someone who really should have been talked with.

He never was, like a whole generation he was demobbed and disappeared off the radar. I don’t think it was better after the Falklands. I recall listening to an Army psychiatrist 10 years after the Falklands, bemoaning the lack of care. It was better after Gulf 1, and probably better now again. But the thought strikes me that it is never good enough. We ask our young men to do some brutal things, and are not that good at making sure the nightmares stop.

I don’t want to get too gloomy, but even this cavalier sometimes wakes up at night feeling uneasy at what he saw and did, and it’s not something that I was particularly given any training to cope with.

Challenger
Challenger
April 7, 2014 10:31 pm

@GNB

‘Wasn’t Viscount Slim a bit uneasy about the Chindits, and indeed elite units generally?’

He was, but i believe a lot of senior commanders were, the trouble was Churchill’s overwhelming enthusiasm for special forces and the existence of eccentric men like Wingate who could implement his vision.

The Chindits were only formed by breaking up the 70th infantry division, a regular and experienced formation in India at the time which many thought would have been better used as a cohesive unit rather than being squandered on costly expeditions of questionable value.

Part of a broader problem in the British Army at the time of special forces taking substantial resources and more importantly the best/brightest men away from the regular line units.

Then again four years of having the bulk of the army sitting at home waiting for a second front was perhaps bound to produce an enthusiasm for irregular forces that were one of the only means of taking the fight to the enemy.

DavidNiven
DavidNiven
April 8, 2014 9:31 am
Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
April 8, 2014 10:11 am

Thing is Triton does the High altitude surveillance bit and compliments a proper manned anti sub aircraft.

On its own it is only part of a capability.

If we purchase P8 and the Triton then we are in business.

Shackvan
Shackvan
April 8, 2014 11:19 am

My hope is that we do go down the Australian/US route and have Triton for all the Tedious Sea surveillance stuff and a small number of P-8’s to do the Sub hunting. I would be interested if anyone is aware of any sources to read regarding how deep the co-operation between P-8 and Triton is, Can a P-8 crew directly control/co-ordinate the drones or to they need to tap into the Sat Controls links or go through a ground station?

bigdave243
bigdave243
April 8, 2014 4:22 pm

http://www.janes.com/article/36491/boeing-brings-forward-c-17-line-closure

The bit at the end is interesting. Maybe the UK will buy a 9th or 10th C-17 in the next 12 months?

I understand we already have the tail numbers set to one side should we wish to buy them.

I apologise if this has been brought up before :-|

El Sid
El Sid
April 8, 2014 7:23 pm

@APatS
My point wasn’t so much the existence of retention surveys, it was more about the use of them, and the processes by which policy is developed. Publishing on the USNI blog or in Proceedings may not be a perfect route to debate things, but I still like the way you’ve got a public platform for an OF-4 to take those surveys and use them to develop an argument and offer solutions.

It’s all very well having committees of bureaucrats in the ivory towers of Whitehall taking surveys, but one of Snodgrass’ arguments is that by the time the Pentagon elite notice a problem in the rear-view mirror – it’s too late. Are we to believe that Whitehall is any better – it’s not like they have a reputation for openness and fostering debate. I don’t want to get too hung up on the specifics of retention (I know it’s a bit of a pet topic for Sir H, I’ve pointed him to it separately), I was more just highlighting an example of how a debate was being conducted.

Gloomy Northern Boy
Gloomy Northern Boy
April 8, 2014 7:30 pm

A couple of things to start a discussion not about kit:

Lord Robertson’s Speech to the Brookings Institute on the “cataclysmic consequences for the West” of an SNP victory in the forthcoming referendum…a touch hyperbolic in my view, but much truth in it…hard to see how an Alliance predicated on CASD with a first strike capability (NATO) or a Country that provides part of that capability with the support of both it’s likely future Governments (the UK) can readily deal with a Country that considers its underlying strategy to be “An affront to Human Decency” as anything other than adversarial or possibly hostile…especially when that Country sits squarely on it’s key sea and air lanes…

My Native City has been the first to express support for the independence of Northern Somaliland…should we pile in with DfID and Military Aid to make it so in this key strategic area, and secure a friendly partner with a large and increasingly successful diaspora in the UK? Should we be doing the same in Sierra Leone?…not my idea originally, so cries of “Author, Author” from Gloomy Court…

GNB :-)

DavidNiven
DavidNiven
April 8, 2014 7:43 pm

Bring the CASD to Anglesey if they vote for independence, there’s already have a power station near buy so no anti nuclear campaigners and a ferry port, plus RAF Anglesey and the jobs would be handy if the scots don’t want to take dirty money. ;-)

Gloomy Northern Boy
Gloomy Northern Boy
April 8, 2014 10:36 pm

@DN – Not previously thought of that, but I am confident that given will (and money) Dai the Bomb could readily become the normal shorthand for a civilian worker at the new Holyhead Submarine Pens…the issue for me is more that with Russia stirring and NATO degrading before our eyes just how serious is the issue of an immediate neighbour viscerally hostile to the long-term cornerstone of our foreign and defence policy? A cornerstone that is supported by both major parties (and even kind-of supported by the third) and has been supported by every Government elected since the Labour Party committed to a British Nuclear Capability?

Thing is, I don’t think history has ended…I think the events of the next ten years will prove that…and I think that the SNP attitude to the measures that we think essential to the defence of our Realm is a matter of real importance…a vital interest at least as significant as the one that has just led Putin to annex the Crimea…

GNB

x
x
April 8, 2014 10:36 pm

How Japan Has Quietly Re-Asserted Its Military Power

Challenger
Challenger
April 8, 2014 11:03 pm

@bigdave243

‘Maybe the UK will buy a 9th or 10th C-17 in the next 12 months?’

I certainly hope so, the UK must be one of the previous buyers in talks with Boeing and it’s a case of now or never.

Gloomy Northern Boy
Gloomy Northern Boy
April 8, 2014 11:09 pm

@x – Fascinating stuff…interesting that everybody on earth is getting tooled up with the exception of the West, which is shambling haphazardly in the direction of it’s next skinny latte…financed, naturally, by the public purse …I’d like to imagine it will end will, but I rather doubt it…

GNB

as
as
April 9, 2014 4:11 pm

I can not see the deterrent going to Wales unless there is an legal agreement that they will never become independent. It costs to much to move it. So it either has to be built in England or the Welsh have to promise they will never have a vote for independence.
I would hate to think how much it is going to cost to move it.

wf
wf
April 9, 2014 4:33 pm

I reckon Trident would move to Barrow

DavidNiven
DavidNiven
April 9, 2014 6:28 pm

‘I can not see the deterrent going to Wales unless there is an legal agreement that they will never become independent’

With RAF Valley being there as well, you do not need to have a legal agreement that they will never become independent ( which you would never get ). Have an agreement drawn up that if they go independent the Isle of Anglesey will become a sovereign base area, as it’s an island so would be a fairly simple task if the security situation deemed that you had to seal it off from the mainland.
Welsh are not as ideological as the Scottish when it comes to independence, they just want to keep their language ( and therefore history ) and have decent opportunities and jobs without the need to move away if they do not want to. In some respects Scottish independence could be a golden opportunity for Wales (if we had decent politicians).

x
x
April 9, 2014 7:27 pm

@ GNB

The multipolar world will be. already is, a dangerous place. The idea of armed conflict for national survival, or for the national interest, is beyond many of us. Look at the shock some have gone into because a few thousand Russians with rifles have popped across a border/left their barracks. Reaction ranges from “it’s against the rules” to basing back BAOR as BAIP. Both extremes show a detachment from the “reality on the ground” as it were. No state operates in a vacuum. A British PM or foreign sec’ will always reference the EU and/or the US in an announcement on a security issue. A Japanese PM, though closely allied with the US, speaks for Japan without much need to reference others. Contrast Japan with Germany who are going the other way. (Though I think, tinfoil hat on, that Europeans perhaps see the UK’s place within the grand project as Europe’s squaddies…….) I think if there is any truth to Germany’s actions in support of one side of the Ukraine flan then the Teutons are a bit naive and stupid and perhaps it is a good thing there aspirations to play outside of Europe beyond trade aren’t progressing at the same speed as South Korea’s and Japanese moves to act out of area. We have lots of capability, little depth, I wonder about whether is a willingness to act if the US wasn’t involved (forget Sierra Leone) , and I think we could do with a focus, a direction, to make up the absence of a peer enemy. Obviously the Japanese don’t have that problem. A bit of vision beyond keeping BAE in business is what is needed. Nationalism isn’t fashionable, and with the majority going through a anti-nation pro-Europe tertiary education system I can’t see the situation being reversed soon. I don’t want kids of my niece’s generation dying for a blue flag with a circle of yellow stars.

x
x
April 9, 2014 8:09 pm

Gareth Jones
April 9, 2014 9:38 pm
Gareth Jones
April 9, 2014 9:40 pm

“A former Army Captain who resigned his commission so he could publish a highly critical book of military involvement in Afghanistan has said ignorant and aggressive tactics which saw towns and villages flattened meant locals quickly came to hate the British more than the Taliban.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/army-historian-whose-book-on-helmand-was-blocked-by-the-mod-is-finally-cleared-to-publish-9249305.html

ArmChairCivvy
ArmChairCivvy
April 9, 2014 9:53 pm

To be read together with David Loyn’s
Butcher and bolt (2009)
ISBN 9780099522638

Gloomy Northern Boy
Gloomy Northern Boy
April 9, 2014 11:23 pm

I’ll reserve judgement until I read the book…my impression from watching the Author on Newsnight was that his view was rather more nuanced than the one portrayed in the Independent Review, which sounds rather like the standing Independent line on the War to me – and is inaccurate in important ways; as I’d guess all here know Afghanistan was never a British Colony, and we always stuck to punitive expeditions in those parts, not long term occupation.

I suspect he may also have more to say about the Army getting involved in a area with a series of long-standing clan feuds and tribal wars…which the politicians spun as an ideological conflict with a unified Islamist proto-state…then further complicated by a pc determination to achieve education for girls and votes for women. My own view is that we should have stuck to a punitive expedition, given the Taliban a caning and then either left or paid the Northern Alliance a handsome sum for basing rights in their territory to keep an eye on things…and left the nation-building idiocy well alone…

However, I know nowt but would be keen to hear from those here who do, if and when any of them read it…

GNB

ArmChairCivvy
ArmChairCivvy
April 10, 2014 7:12 am

GNB, ehat you describe waz termed the Biden strategy… Unfortunately it lost out to yhose who had been impressed by the Surge in Iraq.

The recommended reading I put up leaves off when the Helmand build-up began. Together these two books would give a comprehensive 200- year narrative.

Tubby
Tubby
April 10, 2014 11:19 am

Not sure if this been mentioned, but the Italians are inducting 15 Merlin variants to take over the CSAR and special forces role currently carried out by HH-3 Pelicans.

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pictures-first-italian-air-force-hh-101a-breaks-cover-397221/

Not wanting re-open the wound’s of moving the Green Merlin’s to the FAA, but it seems to me that if we find some spare cash down the back of the sofa that we might want to consider further Merlin purchase for the RAF, maybe alongside a phased draw down of Puma in 2025, say around 25 – 30 cabs, some of which should be of a similar configuration as the Italian CSAR cabs, with the rest being vanilla green Merlins (while it may be wise to add folding rotors and tails, I suspect the performance would be poor at best) . I wondered what the lowest numbers you can build per year at Yeovil without incurring any cost penalty, as we could agree delivery of say 3 new Merlin’s year from 2016, allowing us to re-build slowly the RAF’s Merlin fleet.

Of course the main problem with the idea of CSAR Merlins is the requirement for in-flight refuelling of helicopters, which appears to be something that we do not want to invest in :-(

The Other Chris
April 10, 2014 11:51 am

Yeovil still involved in 101 assembly?

ArmChairCivvy
ArmChairCivvy
April 10, 2014 12:11 pm

@ Tubby, all for your idea. The Portuguese CSAR spec by now so old, that better to look at the Italian (and the US, that did not happen, but it was a combined rqrmnt to protect the Minuteman prairie, so quite fighty… In the air, as well as the landed contingent).

Whatever the minimum rate of production, it should be preserved and safeguarded. It is like ammo (between light and heavier helos):
– you can always have your ARs supplied from an alternative source
– not necessarily so for arty shells and missiles (cfr. Heavier,more specialised helos).

Tubby
Tubby
April 10, 2014 12:13 pm

@ The Other Chris -Not sure, I assumed it was as the development work and testing is taking place at Yeovil and the development aircraft have UK military registrations, so I presumed that the still have the ability to assemble Merlin’s in the UK – hopefully someone who has a definitive answer will pop by!

Tubby
Tubby
April 10, 2014 12:19 pm

@ACC

I was inspired by the fact that the Italian’s are getting CSAR helicopters. A few years before the SDSR there was talk of holding a competition for medium lift helicopters and given we do not want to induct new type into service, I see lots of justification for a trickle build of new 101’s for the RAF, not least the commonality in maintaining them along side the FAA’s Merlin’s, while preserving our sovereign helicopter design and build capabilities.

x
x
April 10, 2014 12:19 pm
ArmChairCivvy
ArmChairCivvy
April 10, 2014 12:21 pm

Not factual, but may have some bearing:

The Italians were happy to go down on the Typhoon workshare, to secure the F35 assembly line.

Always look to the future and discount the past:
-Merlin optimised for the N Atlantic conditions
– anyone since the Norwegians who have taken some?

Hence, dive in there, as per Tubby, and secure your workshare through the continuation of that product line.

ArmChairCivvy
ArmChairCivvy
April 10, 2014 12:25 pm

Hush-hush,

We actually do have a CSAR helo, which is the same as the SF Chinook… Can refuel, but where from?

Speed and range are of coursenothing to be sniffed at.

x
x
April 10, 2014 12:40 pm

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/04/08/polish-msbs-riflebullpup-upgraded-pictured/

Not a fan. The Army deserves Tavor. But an interesting option (mentioned here before by me and somebody else) given HMG’s obsession with pumping as much money as it can into Poland.

Observer
Observer
April 10, 2014 12:51 pm

x, not much difference between this and TAR really. Most AR platforms are generic, differences are mostly cosmetic for all of them. Functionality wise, not much difference between issuing an infantryman an M-16/M-4, AUG, TAR, SAR or MSBS. They simply just give an infantryman a 5.56mm rifle.

The extremely rare case of a weapon that is so functional that it simply stands out from the rest of the class, I have only encountered ONCE in my life, that is the Ultimax. All the rest are really swappable. M-16/M-4 vs TAR/SAR? Tried than, not much difference. 40mm AGLs? Not much difference there as well. M-2 vs CIS 50? Same thing more or less.

All the talk on “model x vs model y” is really cosmetic.

Tom
April 10, 2014 1:44 pm

Re AW101 – as I understand it Yeovil is the main builder/assembler for AW101, but I imagine that politics demands that Italian Military AW101s are built in Italy.

The original RAF Merlins were brought with half an eye towards, CSAR/SOps role, hence things like being plumbed for a refueling probe. The RAF Regt had a ground extraction element permanently attached to 28 (AC) Sqn as E Flt.

x
x
April 10, 2014 2:15 pm

@ Observer

Thanks I didn’t realise that.

Tubby
Tubby
April 10, 2014 3:23 pm

@ACC

Thanks for the information re: Chinook, I was under the impression that it wasn’t used for CSAR but for CAS VAC, I guess we had wait for Project Julius to sort out the software to get a CSAR capability.

April 10, 2014 3:41 pm

Just to stir it up a bit , only from Russia not one but two ,over and under, 152mm Howitzers on a single chassis.
http://www.military-today.com/artillery/koalitsija_sv.htm
The demonstrator of the Koalitsija-SV uses a modified Msta-S chassis, however production self-propelled howitzer will have a new tracked chassis based on the new Armata series. Production vehicles will be also fitted with larger turret.
The demonstrator vehicle has a crew of 5, however production Koalitsija-SV will have a high level of automation. It’s crew will consists of only two men, located in a protected compartment at the front of the hull.
In terms of added weight / complexity vs redundancy / rate of fire I guess the Russians have done the math that the much more likely system to break down in actual combat is the very complex auto loader , having a spare tube and loader on the same chassis for a ‘few’ extra tonnes could keep the system at least firing until the broken loader is fixed/cleared. In the MRSI mode surely using two tubes would reduce the required rate of round selection by each of the autoloaders reducing the likelihood of some malfunction (say each loader cycling at 6 RPM rather than one at 12 RPM)
It was due to enter production by the end of this year.

mr.fred
mr.fred
April 10, 2014 5:09 pm

Curiosity demands I ask what advantages the Tavor might have over other rifles, even if they are broadly similar.

x
x
April 10, 2014 5:20 pm

@ mr fred

Apparently none.

DavidNiven
DavidNiven
April 10, 2014 5:31 pm

@mr.fred

As I think x knows, over the current service rifle it has ergonomic and weight advantages. Which is pretty much the same advantage many modern assault rifles have over the SA 80.

Observer
Observer
April 10, 2014 5:48 pm

On the other hand, a few hundred grams of weight isn’t going to break an infantryman’s arm, and ergonomics sometimes just means what you are comfortable with. Not many ARs are messed up to such an extent that they cannot be used by humans in their main role of aimed suppressive fire or single shot takedown.

Name me one rifle that can’t be used at all.

I transitioned from M-16, to M-4 carbine to a bullpup SAR-21. None of which ever gave me problems, just a need to get into new habits of weapons handling. Some M-16 guys complain about the new bullpup, but when the new guys who were only trained on the SAR-21 were given the M-16 to handle, they made almost the same complaints. Why? Because both parties were not used to the other rifle and had to get re-familiarized.

Were any of them not able to use the rifles? No. 5.56 rounds still went downrange.

All Politicians are the Same
All Politicians are the Same
April 10, 2014 6:14 pm

@Observer
The L85-A2 is quite heavy, when both loaded with a 30 round mag and a sight it is 1.6KG heavier than an M4.

x
x
April 10, 2014 6:18 pm

@ DN

Dude I read it on the internet that Tavor has no advantages over the M16. So it must be true.

DavidNiven
DavidNiven
April 10, 2014 6:28 pm

I never said that it can’t be used, the SA 80 is a very accurate weapon. But if it was to go on trial today against modern assault rifles it would fail every time on ergonomic issues and weight.
The SAR 21 has an ambidextrous cocking/charging handle do is not? also is the change lever located on the left hand side of the weapon above and behind the magazine, like the SA 80?

As I said the weapon is usable and has proven itself to be reliable (after some modification, which made it heavier) but if you were designing it today the ergonomics would be better thought out.

Red Trousers
Red Trousers
April 10, 2014 6:52 pm

APATS,

I think the L85 weight is not an issue. I find SA80 insubstantial, and much preferred the SLR, but as Observer alludes to above, it is probably a matter of loving what you first trained with. In truth, the all up weight of L85 plus four mags of 30 5.56 is probably not much different to SLR plus four mags of 20 7.62.

I haven’t fired an SLR since about 1994, but I am still completely confident that I could strip and assemble one blindfolded. Muscle memory! I really don’t think I could say the same if L85. Ghastly fiddly thing with bits that drop off and using toy town bullets.

No, I am not inviting a 7.62 vs 5.56 war…..!

All Politicians are the Same
All Politicians are the Same
April 10, 2014 7:07 pm

@RT

I was awaiting the first 7.62MM comment and I have no issues with that but the relevant question is what advantage am I gaining by carrying an L85-A2 and an extra 1.6KG over a similarly equipped M4?
Of course it is lighter than a full length 7.62MM rifle but it is still bloody heavier than its contemporaries.

It was also heavier than the AKMS I had the pleasure of using on one deployment.

x
x
April 10, 2014 7:50 pm

I remember the first time I carried an SLR. I thought it was too heavy even unloaded who could carry it? I carried it on a huge trek across a great plain into a cave……

OK I was 5 and I was allowed to carry it all away across the drill hall to the armoury.

But the memory did scar me.

Even then a 5 how I wish I had a M16 and thought surely the M16 must be the apogee of small arms design.. I wonder if in some distant future would God’s chosen people waste time building a rifle out of plastic to better the M16. Nah! Too improbable. I was quite the philosopher even at 5.

Red Trousers
Red Trousers
April 10, 2014 8:07 pm

APATS,

No opinions on one dinky little toy rifle over another.

The only proper rifle for drill is a 7.62 or wooden .303. You can also club OPFOR over the head with it rather better with either than with some piece of plastic shit that’s not very long. And you are further away from OPFOR when using a bayonet. And there were a well known 27 bits of an SLR that you could use to open a bottle of beer (coke when in some prudish country), and I don’t think that was a KUR at all on the L85 design brief.

There, the eternal calibre war, sorted. RT style. ;)

I rather love the FN SCAR-H, in the absence of an SLR.

Observer
Observer
April 10, 2014 8:13 pm

APATS, no advantage, yes, but does that mean you can’t deploy with it? No, you just suffer a bit more. It builds character. :P Think of it as muscle building. You can still deploy, you can still fight a war with it. You just get a bit more uncomfortable. That is what I mean when I say that there is no difference with most similar equipment, strategically there is absolutely no change at all in your capabilities, just your comfort level.

And if you joined the army for comfort, you need a long talk with your recruiter.

DN, ambidex charging handle yes. But the extraction port is close to your cheek on the right, so if you tried to use it left handed, beware of flying hot brass. And if you lean too far forward as a lefty, it gives literal meaning to the term “eat hot brass”. So no, SOP is everyone uses their right hand. Or you give the lefty the SAW.

RT, you just touched on one of the biggest complaints of our new rifle lol. Can’t butt stroke someone properly with it.

All Politicians are the Same
All Politicians are the Same
April 10, 2014 8:17 pm

@RT
I like Rifles that look like rifles as well :)

Personally, I have a tooth that has never failed me with a beer bottle when push came to shove.

Drill.

All Politicians are the Same
All Politicians are the Same
April 10, 2014 8:21 pm

@Observer

As i never ever joined the Army, can i complain that i am even forced to discover these things though? :)

I never ever said it was unusable but you have to question why your rifle weighs 33% more than the person next to you and it cannot be fired left handed?

there is a change in capability levels as a higher percentage of people will be firing “off handed” and some people wills struggle with the extra weight. It may not be a strategic game changer and personally I never found it an issue but it should not be glossed over either.

Observer
Observer
April 10, 2014 8:47 pm

@ACC

“As i never ever joined the Army, can i complain that i am even forced to discover these things though? ”

Sure! It’s your wife’s duty to listen to all her husband’s cares and worries. :P Hope your sofa’s comfortable.

” you have to question why your rifle weighs 33% more than the person next to you”

The army was cutting costs on dumbbells. Rifle overhead now lad! Hurry it up!

April 10, 2014 8:55 pm

@APATS

Ahh but dont the Americans perform drill…. “drill”… with hollowed out rifles?

Or is that a forces-myth? lol never bothered to ask the USAF guys on BoB/Remembrance Sunday parades.

DavidNiven
DavidNiven
April 10, 2014 8:57 pm

‘ambidex charging handle yes’

Well there’s an ergonomic advantage straight away.

All Politicians are the Same
All Politicians are the Same
April 10, 2014 9:00 pm

@ Mike

Nope those M1 Rifles weigh just over 4Kgs mate.

ArmChairCivvy
ArmChairCivvy
April 10, 2014 9:03 pm

Heh-heh , I did join the army

… Just a working accident by Observer.
And as for today’s org. Chart, I would, in fact, háve joined the navy, rather than the army.

Observer
Observer
April 10, 2014 9:09 pm

Thought you were Navy.

All Politicians are the Same
All Politicians are the Same
April 10, 2014 9:11 pm

@Observer

I am, ACC is not :) You replied to wrong person.

Observer
Observer
April 10, 2014 9:16 pm

Well… I suppose I can correct my mistake by tossing him into the sea. :)

Mea culpa

wpDiscuz
↓