Ship to Shore Logistics – 24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

In the previous couple of posts I have described a range of potential solutions for a rapidly installed pier head and shore connecting pier with a range of handling equipment for break bulk, containerised and RORO cargo.

The final type of cargo is liquids, ordinarily fuels and water.

For water, the preferred option would be to avoid transporting it over the shore completely, although a vital component of any operation it is generally much more efficient to transport the means to obtain and process it suitable for use as close to the point of need as possible. Pumping bulk potable water from a ship, across the pier head and pier should therefore be seen as a last resort when other options are unavailable.

Therefore, I am going to concentrate on fuel, a liquid that cannot be obtained from rivers, streams, lakes or boreholes and purified in situ.

Modern forces have a very high and increasing fuel demand and with the increasing use of air conditioning, local power generation and all manner of electronic devices this is a trend unlikely to reverse. The general trend towards larger and heavier vehicles also results in a hefty fuel demand, even if they are not charging great distances.

Estimated demand scales for fuel usage from even a few years ago, must by now be completely out of date.

The reality of most operations is that a force will be able to make use of fuel already available in theatre but the assumption must be that an expeditionary force brings its own.

The last significant operation that UK forces carried out that had to land large quantities of fuel was Operation Corporate, the retaking of the Falkland Islands in 1982.

There were some salutary lessons learned there regarding bulk fuel, the force landed in 1982 was extremely ‘vehicle light’, those vehicles that were landed generally had much lower fuel consumption than those now in service and there were no multi screen cineplexes masquerading as Brigade HQ’s like there is today!

Operation Corporate fuel logistics were compounded by a lack of a single fuel policy but maintaining even modest petrol stocks for the handful of Rapier battery’s placed a massive strain on the available vertical lift. Much of the fuel landed was via the medium of a single 4 Tonne Bedford POD shuttling between ship and shore on a Mexeflote or landing craft and discharging into jerrycans

Fuel was always a problem, after MOGAS (motor gasoline) for the Rapier units, AVGAS for the San Carlos FOB was a top priority. At its peak the FOB dispensed over 50,000 litres of fuel per and supported nearly 120 aircraft movements per day.

So although we now enjoy the benefits of a single fuel policy and much expanded vertical lift the demand side of the equation is not balanced by these changes.

Any ship to shore logistics capability must therefore consider fuel, and maybe water.

Joint Operational Fuel System (JOFS)

In 2010 KBR were awarded a £22m contract to deliver the Joint Operational Fuel System (JOFS). JOFS is a broad ranging system designed for operational and exercise use.

JOFS is defined as;

JOFS is a generic term covering all special purpose military equipment designed to enable the receipt, storage, testing and treatment, and supply of bulk fuel quickly, safely and efficiently on deployed joint operations, within the Land environment anywhere in the world, in diverse climatic conditions, over extended lines of communication, for extended periods of time and where the Host Nation’s infrastructure is broken, damaged or non-existent

To quote QinetiQ (who were involved with the decision support, bid support modelling)

The goal of the Joint Operational Fuel System was to deliver a fully integrated modular military fuel capability that will receive, store, test/blend, dispense and distribute bulk fuel from ship to shore, by air transport, by bulk carrying vehicle, by rail tanker, by inland waterway and using host nation support. This system will replace ageing fuel handling equipments which will not meet the demands of future expeditionary operations. The current deployable fuel handling capability for expeditionary operations, known as Tactical Fuel Handling Equipment, is supplied by a plethora of individual systems. It is based around cold war designs and is not considered expeditionary by the user community

The project manager added;

In all there were sixteen different equipment lines when the project was started. The equipment could only be operated in a static location. Equipment had not been designed for rapid movement and ease of use in the field. We needed to develop a solution that delivered the fuel to the right place at the right time and in the right quantity

The complete Joint Operational Fuel System, as can be seen from the image below) is pretty comprehensive and includes ship to shore elements but entirely correctly, priority has been given to operational use in Afghanistan.

Joint Operational Fuel System 640x387 Ship to Shore Logistics   24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

Joint Operational Fuel System

Joint Operational Fuel System1 640x480 Ship to Shore Logistics   24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

Joint Operational Fuel System

Earlier this year Vikoma were awarded a £2.5 sub contract from KBR to deliver a number of ruggedised powerpacks for pumping equipment and tanker rollover spill containment systems. This new contract was to add to a previous one, the output from which have been successfully used in Afghanistan.  Another manufacturer, Barum and Dewar, provided the specialist storage cases.

Joint Operational Fuel Systems Project (JOFS) pumps, 160 of them, come in three flavours, Light Forces Pump (LFP) with a capacity of 400 litres per minute at 4 bar, Medium Duty Pump (MDP) with a capacity of 680 Litres per minute at 6 bar and the Heavy Duty Pump (HDP) with a capacity of 2,000 litres per minute at 6 bar. These pumps can be remotely powered up to 15m away from the Vikoma powerpacks, this means they are outside of the hazardous area

Joint Operational Fuel System2 640x480 Ship to Shore Logistics   24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

Joint Operational Fuel System

The system is compatible with current Air Portable Fuel Containers (APFC) and can be used with either Aviation or Diesel fuel, depending what assets require re-fuelling. The Small Container Convoy Refuelling System (SCCRS) is designed to provide a 7 point refuelling unit for refuelling multiple vehicles at once.

Most of the JOFS components are provided by the UK company, DESMI, who also provide much of the pumping equipment for RN/RFA vessels and RAF fuel installations. DESMI produce some excellent fuel packages, the Aviation Fuelling System, Bulk Fuel Installation for Temporary Sites, Containerised Ground Fuel Stations, Air Landed Aircraft Refuelling Point (ALARP), Forward Air Refuelling Point (FARP), Helicopter/Light Aircraft Refuelling System and Air Delivered Bulk Fuel Installation

Storage and handling of fuels and lubricants is a complex and demanding business, especially the relationships between military and civilian regulations and who does what across the three services and within (RE and RLC), have a read of JSP 317 if you don’t believe me!

Any system deployed would need to be compatible with the UK JOFS but also various NATO standards and the US ELCAS capability.

Tankers and Tank Containers

One option to meet the fuel demands of an embarked force is to use existing vehicle stock landed onto the CONCEPT 2 Pier Head via RORO ships.

This is simple, requires no additional equipment and would be relatively quick, but we don’t have that many and they would displace other vehicles beyond those normally scaled.

Moving bulk fuel, transferring to smaller vehicles or packed is something the RLC/RE do as part of their day job, but we should consider alternatives.

Vehicles

Driving a tanker off a RORO vessel onto the pier head, down the pier and to wherever, would seem to be a very simple option

Close Support Tanker and Tactical Refueller

Tactical Air Refueller

Tactical Refueller 640x427 Ship to Shore Logistics   24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

Tactical Air Refueller

Both use the Oshkosh MTVR derived tractor

Unit Support Tanker

Replacing the old 4 Tonne Bedford UBRE ‘PODS’ is the MAN Support Vehicle Unit Support Tanker, 81 of them

MAN SV Unit Support Tanker USDT 640x472 Ship to Shore Logistics   24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

MAN SV Unit Support Tanker (UST)

Tank Containers and Jerrycans

Palletised jerry cans are a simple means of transporting packed fuel and tank containers are being increasingly used, again, relatively simple for any suitable truck, especially STANAG 2413 hook lift type DROPS or EPLS type vehicles

The Fuel Dispensing Rack (10 of) has been obtained by the MoD from the German company WEW for use in Afghanistan, integrated with JOFS. They can hold and dispense up to 9,500 litres and have replaced the older DROPS Pallet UBRE equipment, now on sale.

WEW Water ISO Tank Container 01 Ship to Shore Logistics   24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

Without the dispensing equipment, simple tank containers could also be used with a capacity of 26,000 litres

WEW Water ISO Tank Container 03 Ship to Shore Logistics   24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

Conventional containers can also be converted and if pilferage might be an issue, tank containers that look like normal containers can also be used, click here to see examples.

Air Delivered

Although this concept is ostensibly about the higher capacity logistics enablement air delivery of fuel is still worth considering and the air portable containers can also be used in a non airborne manner.

The Mk5 Air Portable Fuel Container from GKN Aerospace has been used in Afghanistan and can hold a couple of tonnes each.

Mk 5 Air Portable Fuel Containers 640x480 Ship to Shore Logistics   24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

The Air Portable Fuel Containers MK 5 are enormous rubber balls which enable essential fuel supplies to be delivered by air to more remote areas of operations. The balloon like containers, which hold up to two tonnes of fuel each, also contain polymer Kevlar, a flexible plastic commonly used in body armour, to keep the contents protected from enemy fire. Measuring 4.5 feet in diameter when full, these new containers can be easily transported in a sling under a helicopter or in the back of a transport aircraft. The Kevlar protection means they can also be parachuted into locations or dropped from heights of up to 25 feet. It means that personnel stationed at forward operating bases or check points – who rely on fuel to power the generators which provide them with heat, light, medical facilities and communications equipment – do not have to wait as long as they would for the vital supplies to be transported by road.

Mk 5 Air Portable Fuel Containers1 640x480 Ship to Shore Logistics   24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

Mk5 Air Portable Fuel Containers

The ATMP Fuel Cat can make excellent use of the APFC, a self contained system for the delivery and dispensing of fuel

Supacat All Terrain Mobility Platform ATMP Fuel Handling 640x480 Ship to Shore Logistics   24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

Dracones

Dracones are large rubber bladders that can be filled with fuel and towed to shore, basically, a big rubber tube sealed at both ends. They might sound flimsy but are far from it, resistant to damage from rocks and other obstructions.

They were invented in the late 1950′s at Cambridge University by William Rede Hawthorne and have been developed by Goodyear, now Trelleborg and DESMI since to increase capacities, the largest now able to hold over 900 cubic metres.

Once towed and dragged ashore, pipes are connected and their contents pumped out. In the right circumstances dracones can be very effective and are simple and cheap although handling is not easy, apparently

It is worth noting that they were used in the Falkland Islands before the Argentine invasion and in this spectacular example of failing to benefit from extensive forward vision, from Hansard

HC Deb 18 January 1982 vol 16 c34W 34W

Mr. Shersby asked the Secretary of State for Defence if, in view of the usefulness of the “Dracone” to the Falkland Islands Government, as in the recent case where its use enabled fresh water to be supplied to the Polish factory ship “Gryt Pomorski” at Port Stanley, he will now donate the “Dracone” to the Government of the Islands instead of requiring it to be brought back to the United Kingdom by HMS “Endurance” in the spring of 1982.

Mr. Blaker No. There is a continuing defence requirement for the “Dracone” in the United Kingdom.

Here is one (Towed Flexible Barge) in use, down south (courtesy of the RE Association)

1380003 604855529560159 615927405 n Ship to Shore Logistics   24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

Dracone

Pipeline

A higher capacity solution would require the use of a tanker, some pipeline to the shore and the appropriate storage and dispensing equipment at the ‘beachhead’ or Beach Support Area as it evolves to a Combat Service Support Area

Over the Shore

Although JOFS does have an other the shore element the best example of large scale fuel offload over the shore is from the US

The MSC MV K.R. Wheeler is a modified DP2 Platform Supply Vessel built by Edison Chouest and was introduced in 2007 to replace the SS Chesapeake and SS Petersburg.

Their Offshore 850 pipeline is supplied by Flexible Pipelines Ltd of Thame, Oxfordshire

MV Vice Adm. K.R. Wheeler 640x443 Ship to Shore Logistics   24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

MV Vice Adm. K.R. Wheeler

MV VADM K.R. Wheeler T AG 5001 640x452 Ship to Shore Logistics   24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

MV VADM K.R. Wheeler (T-AG-5001)

She carries eight miles of pipeline on 5 large spools that can be lifted onto INLS causeways ferries and other lighterage. This is double the distance of the OPDS system and can be deployed much quicker with fewer personnel. Instead of using cumbersome mooring lines the KR Wheeler makes use of dynamic positioning and the 165 foot long tender vessel, the MV Fast Tempo, is used to run the pipes from the Wheelers stern to tankers and ashore from the bow.

The Fast Tempo was formerly a crew boat designed and built by Breaux Brothers of Louisiana

A LARC is used to carry the Beach Terminal Unit to shore where it is linked to other pipeline, pumping, storage and distribution systems

Pumping rate is 1.7 million US gallons per 20 hours.

The new system is now called the Offshore Petroleum Distribution System, still OPDS though. It can also be used for fresh water.

The final and most important advantage of the new system is that the specially constructed, multiple layer flexible pipe can be laid over rocks and coral.

What the Wheeler has shown is that modern commercially available materials and systems can radically improve capabilities and reduce costs, read more here

If CONCEPT 2 were utilise an over the shore instead of connecting to the Pier Head this would be an idea system to resuse.

Pier Head Connector

An alternative to the system used by the US ELCAS would be to utilise the CONCEPT 2 Pier Head and Connecting Pier.

Conceptually, pumping bulk fuel ashore down the pier is very simple but the devil will be in the details.

Downsides, one would of course be putting all ones eggs in a single basket and when offloading hazardous fuels it would not be desirable to conduct other ship offloading operations, so throughput of other cargo would take a dip.

Operating at risk would be possible but it would have to be confined to ‘needs must’ type scenarios.

Having the appropriate pumping equipment on the CONCEPT 2 Pier Head ship would not present any significant challenges and given their size, they might even be able to act as a storage facility, pumping to shore on demand regardless of the presence of a tanker. Depending on the mooring configuration used dracones could be close moored to the Pier Head to act as floating storage facilities of storage onshore was restricted.

A jackstay type rig might also be considered if the fuel or replenishment vessel could be held steady

Getting the fuel ashore, down the Pier, is a little more of a challenge because fuel pipelines and vehicle traffic are not the best of bedfellows.

It could be possible to pre-install metal pipe into the pier span structures, the Mabey Quick Span example described in the previous post. These could be installed in multiples and connected with flexible joints. Connecting at both ends of every single span does sound labour intensive even though it would probably be the neatest solution.

An alternative would be to install a pipeline and electrical cable tray to the sides of the pier deck.

Cable Tray 640x302 Ship to Shore Logistics   24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

Cable Tray

Hook on or swing out supports that carry drop in multi span mesh cable tray would be quick to install and allow the use of continuous flexible pipeline(s) by supporting them along their entire length with simple spanning pieces dropped into the small gaps at pier supports.

Because it would be side mounted it would not interfere with vehicle traffic in any way. Installation of the flexible pipe down the length of the pier would be carried out by a vehicle mounted dispenser reel and a manifold fitted at the shore interface to allow multiple directions of pipeline to storage and dispensing facilities.

Sources and Further Reading

Military Water Supply

Fuel Supplies in Time of War

Can the USMC Support Bulk Liquids Requirements in a Ship to Objective Maneuver Environment?

 

Other Posts in the Series

Ship to Shore Logistics – 01 (Introduction)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 02 (History – 1944 Europe)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 03 (History – 1982 the Falkland Islands)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 04 (History – 2003 Iraq)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 05 (History – 2010 Haiti)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 06 (Case Study Observations)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 07 (Doctrine and Concepts)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 08 (Requirements and Drivers)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 09 (Current Capabilities and Future Plans)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 10 (Allies – the USA)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 11 (Mid Point Review)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 12 (Ports, Beaches or Both)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 13 (Expeditionary Port Access Concepts)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 14 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 1 – Survey and Munitions Clearance)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 15 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 1 – Repair and Debris Removal)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 16 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 1 – Dredging, Aids to Navigation and Mooring)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 17 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 1 – RORO Link Span and Cargo Handling)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 18 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 1 – Summary)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 19 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Introduction)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 20 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 - Why Not Just Buy JLOTS)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 21 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Requirements and Components)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 22 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Pier Head and Material Handling)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 23 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Access Pier)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 25 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Wave Attenuation)

Ship to Shore Logistics – 26 (Wrapping Up)

 

 

About Think Defence

Think Defence hopes to start sensible conversations about UK defence issues, no agenda or no campaign but there might be one or two posts on containers, bridges and mexeflotes!

12 thoughts on “Ship to Shore Logistics – 24 (Expeditionary Port Access – Concept 2 – Fuel)

  1. S O

    “AVGAS for the San Carlos FOB was a top priority.”

    Do British people call kerosene “AVGAS”?
    I thought that would be 82-145 octane gasolines.

  2. wf

    @TD: do they provide any guidance for the fuel load actually required to be stored ashore in pillows? If we can rapidly unload tankers via pipeline, better for them that they rapidly clear the beach head afterwards.

  3. monkey

    With the ever greater thrust towards protected equipment , increasing its weight and reducing its payload to weight ratios ever further,fuel consumption is on the increase (in World War II, the armed forces used about one gallon of fuel per soldier every day. In Desert Storm, fuel usage was about four gallons. By 2007, with operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, usage was up to 16 gallons per soldier.) An expeditionary force which needs all its transport/equipment protected may be even higher today despite new model equipment benifiting from improvements in fuel consumption per kw / hp generated.Mobility is key when using limited high cost resources around a fluid battle front at speed as the need arises (worrying about how close the needle is to the red on the fuel guage should be way down the squaddies list of priorties) This article shows just how complex and therefore expensive delivering fuel stocks is . Using existing tried and proven technologies say from the exploration petrochemicals industry where cost effectiveness and saftey go hand in hand and supplies of ready use stocks of equipment (not to mentioned trained operators used to working in difficult enviroments ) are plentiful . This equipment and operators are usually working within only a few days travel of many flash points(they tend to work in the regions where much of their work takes place and why we would go there) . Often replacement equipment all ready on order or in stock or even in transit to the region we need to be.

  4. Craig

    On the subject of CORPORATE, I’m surprised you didn’t mention the floating pipeline at Ascension Island constructed by the Royal Engineers and through which the Americans supplied 12.5 million gallons of fuel during the conflict.

    http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=kuYjpFPgwT0C&lpg=PA54&ots=VmmNYzWE5L&dq=%22royal%20engineers%22%20ascension%20pipeline&pg=PA54#v=onepage&q=%22royal%20engineers%22%20ascension%20pipeline&f=false

    http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=8Y63V3TfO6QC&lpg=PA82&ots=oHec50Ekc2&dq=%22royal%20engineers%22%20ascension%20pipeline&pg=PA82#v=onepage&q=%22royal%20engineers%22%20ascension%20pipeline&f=false

  5. Think Defence Post author

    SO and Dave, will have to go back to my big bumper book of fuel designations and additives. I do know that the Rapier batteries and RA command posts used CIVGAS or petrol for their generators which caused a big pain

    Monkey, good point

    Craig, a bit embarrassed for missing that one! Am out and about at the minute so away from by books on the subject, the best one was from Edward Fursden,

    You can get it from Amazon for a penny, bargain of the decade

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Falklands-Aftermath-Picking-up-Pieces/dp/0850522056/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1386165246

    Here is his obituary

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/majgen-edward-fursdon-431366.html

    Will have to have a rummage later and update this one

  6. A Different Gareth

    The floating pipeline at Ascension Island is still in use according to the Day Two section of this Economist correspondent’s diary page:

    “The power for all this came, until recently, from a battery of seven V-12 marine engines, each of which delivers over a megawatt. Every 18 months or so a tanker moors off English Bay and delivers about 6000 tonnes of fuel to the tank farm there through a floating pipeline. This powers many of the island’s cars, as well as the generators. ”

    A candidate for that floating pipeline is visible on google maps but is in Clarence Bay rather than English Bay.

    Dracones – I suppose you could pile a load of pier supports into the seabed in a grid pattern and tie them up in rows? I was wondering whether you could slot empty ones underneath the pier as you build it to act as storage tanks but I assume it would be unsafe to handle fuel like that. Or for an even worse idea if you go for the double pier arrangement thread dracones crosswise underneath both piers. You could fit loads in.

  7. dave haine

    @ TD

    They did indeed, because they bought the cheapest off the shelf gennie that did the job. Sometimes, COTS is not the answer…. Mind you, a bit of joined up thinking, would have got them diesel gennies…

    Up here for thinking, down there for dancing….

  8. dave haine

    I seem to remember one unit deploying to Bosnia with LR series3, when the rest of the army was all diesel. Apparently the only spare long toms were from a TA unit…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>