Beards and whiskers may be worn only with authority

My favourite Parliamentary Question for a while;

Tobias Ellwood (Bournemouth East, Conservative)
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what regulations there are on facial hair for personnel in the Army.

Hansard source (Citation: HC Deb, 18 January 2013, c963W)

Mark Francois (Rayleigh and Wickford, Conservative)
The regulation governing facial hair for personnel in the Army is laid down in Army General Administrative Instruction as follows:

“Hair is to be well cut and trimmed, except where authority has been granted otherwise on religious grounds. Style and colour (if not natural) is not to be of an exaggerated nature. Moustaches are to be trimmed and not below the line of the lower lip. Beards and whiskers may be worn only with authority, and this will usually be granted only on medical or religious grounds, or where tradition permits. The appearance of the beard and whiskers is to be neat and tidy. Sideburns are not to descend below the mid point of the ear and are to be trimmed horizontally.”

Fantastic

Pub quiz time, what makes these fine fellow the exception?

4882540334 b3b2a217fb Beards and whiskers may be worn only with authority

 

 

 

The answer is on their arm

 

 

 

 

 

About Think Defence

Think Defence hopes to start sensible conversations about UK defence issues, no agenda or no campaign but there might be one or two posts on containers, bridges and mexeflotes!

12 thoughts on “Beards and whiskers may be worn only with authority

  1. x

    For those of you who don’t know in the RN you don’t request to grow a beard, but request to stop shaving.

  2. Wstr

    Shiny ceremonial silver implements, long historical connection with construction, and although not shown I’ve got a distinct recollection of leather aprons… I’ve got it! Royal Regiment of Freemasons ??

  3. Obsvr

    Could it be 74 (The Battle Axe Company) Battery Royal Artillery, but there’s been a mixup with the capbadges. However, beards have been fasionable, nay traditional, with pioneer sergeants in at least some battalions, although I believe the assault pioneer platoon left peace establisiment of infantry battalions many years ago, perhaps there’s still a sergeant for old times sake.

    Looking at the figures, I might suggest the army has got leaner if not meaner in the ensuing half century (at least).

  4. Mike Edwards

    It’s the Pioneers and something else here. Burying bodies, and SLJ’s are their forte.

    But unsure of the Royal Welch Fusilier Connection, with the Welch Regiment?

  5. Mike Edwards

    @Think Defence… Pioneers upset by being told the truth *shocker*. Don’t remember them being the sharpest tool in the shed, and comparing that to the baseline of the average Infantryman “Squaddie” is truly saying something. ;)

  6. Red Trousers

    There are(?) / were operational reasons as well. I recall being allowed to not shave or cut my hair on a tour in Belfast in the late 80s in my early 20s, as my role involved my being in civvies (not sneaky beaky, mind – that was beyond my competence, but it was helpful to be low observable in a street of people). Gordon Bennet, but 3 months later I’d got a duck’s fuzz. And straggly shoulder length hair. Actually, perfect for the grotty student look. What was not so good is being stopped (looking grotty student-like) by the security guard at M&S in central Belfast, who took me to one side and said “Sir, your pistol is showing above your jeans”. Obviously, I was not cut out for the sneakily stuff. I mean, how the hell did he know?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>