UK Military Bridging – Look Back Look Forward

This has been a tremendously rewarding series to write, the depth of expertise, team work, diligence and hard won experience translated into operational advantage has been incredible to read about, quite humbling and certainly a privilege.

At every stage the UK has been at the forefront of military bridging operations and design.

Looking forward…

In the short term, the Royal Engineers will likely be reorganised along the Multi Role Brigade lines as defined by the SDSR and it is likely that the equipment in service will not fundamentally change. Maybe REBS will be bought into service post Afghanistan and some form of mid-life refurbishment for the BR90 components might see the light of day, perhaps even a transfer of the equipment to the surplus MAN Support Vehicles that will be likely post SDSR draw downs in overall force size.

WFEL, Faun and Mabey continue to sell their equipment worldwide; the legacy of the MEXE alumni continues to earn money for the UK, certainly the best outcome from the wanton vandalism committed by successive governments on the Research Establishments.

Bridging is somewhat unusual because the ‘problem’ does not change. Rivers, canals and other gaps have not changed significantly since the first use of military bridging. The need for speed continues as there is never enough time to cross the river but future designs are likely to focus on cost and reducing the number of personnel used to deploy and recover bridges. Personnel are where the costs lie and it is here that future designs will be driven.

New materials will also continue to play a large part in future designs

Am going to keep adding to this series as new images or videos come to light so if anyone wants to add any new information or media just let me know.

I would also like to thank the various people that have given me permission to use some of their images, each image should have an appropriate credit and of course, I must not forget to mention the One More River to Cross book from Col John Joiner RE that provided the inspiration and much of the background for the series. I would urge anyone with even a passing interest to pop over to the RE Museum, Corps Enterprise Website or even (if you must) Amazon and buy a copy of this book and I hope that the medium of a web page can provide a little extra insight into the subject because it is so easy to add video and colour images.

 

 

OTHER POSTS IN THIS SERIES

Introduction

Definitions and General Terms

Early Days

WWI

WWII – Far East Theatre

WWII – Africa and Northwest Europe

WWII – Italy

Post War

Iraq and Afghanistan

Equipment – Military Load Classification

Equipment – Floating Bridges

Equipment – Assault Bridging

Equipment – Construction Bridging

Equipment – Pre WWII

Equipment – The Bailey Bridge

Equipment – The Medium Girder Bridge

Equipment – Air Portable Bridges

Equipment – BR90 and REBS

Equipment – Trackway

Look Back and Look Forward

About Think Defence

Think Defence hopes to start sensible conversations about UK defence issues, no agenda or no campaign but there might be one or two posts on containers, bridges and mexeflotes!

6 thoughts on “UK Military Bridging – Look Back Look Forward

  1. jackstaff

    Boss,

    It’s indeed been a great series. And if I can manage any time in the coming week I’ll try to comment more intelligently on a couple of the individual posts (esp. those on the more rapidly-deployable bridging gear and configurations.) For now I’ll offer a sentimental remark, that it’s a particular pleasure to read outside my usual subject areas since my old granddad spent his war (the active service bits) alternately blowing up (to deny German access for counterattack) and rebuilding bridges along the southern edge of 21st Army Group. The roots of many an historian (active or lapsed :) lie in family, and it’s a pleasure to read the more contemplative series like this and think on that.

    Also, has somebody who’s been an editor as well as an historian (trained, anyway) and analyst (always could edit everyone for length but myself ;-) “the wanton vandalism committed by successive governments on the Research Establishments” is a happy turn of phrase.

  2. Dangerous Dave

    I’d like to second Jackstaff’s last paragraph. With the various research extablishments, it is difficult to see where the indigenous developments for the UK armed Forces are going to come from, except as pay-through-the-nose products by private industry.

  3. Dangerous Dave

    Oh bugger, must read comment before sending. Second sentance should read “Without the various research establishments . . .”

  4. jackstaff

    DD,

    Thanks — and I just had that same problem in the UOR vehicles thread. Me a former editor and all — well it’s like shrinks and their psychoses, editors are terrible at their own stuff. I hadn’t even noticed the error. And “pay-through-the-nose products by private industry” is on the money too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>