Parliamentary Answers – to 10th February 2012

This is a regular round up of Parliamentary questions and answers from ministers relevant to defence issues In addition to oral questions, MPs and Peers can ask government ministers questions for written answer. These are often used to obtain detailed information about policies and statistics on the activities of government departments. In the House of Commons ‘ordinary’ questions do not have to be answered on a specific date. An MP will date a written question for two days after they have tabled it (ie, submitted it for answer via the Table Office). The convention is that the MP can expect it to be answered within seven days of the question being tabled.

Question

William McCrea (South Antrim, DUP)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many army personnel are based at each base in Northern Ireland.

Answer

Nick Harvey (Minister of State (Armed Forces), Defence; North Devon, Liberal Democrat)

As at December 2011, the number of regular army personnel based at each location in Northern Ireland was as follows:

Location Number (l)
Joint Helicopter Command Flying Station Aldergrove, 1,000
Abercorn Barracks, Ballykinler 650
Thiepval Barracks, Lisburn 1,120
Kinnegar Base 370
Palace Barracks, Holywood 670
(1) Rounded to the nearest 10.

In addition there were some 50 regular army personnel serving at reserve forces locations throughout Northern Ireland.

 

 

Question

Jim Murphy (East Renfrewshire, Labour)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what efficiency savings have been made on maintenance of Royal Air Force planes.

Answer

Peter Luff (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Equipment, Support and Technology), Defence; Mid Worcestershire, Conservative)

holding answer16 January 2012

The Royal Air Force has operated fleets of a number of different aircraft types over a long period of time. Maintenance arrangements have evolved as aircraft technology has become increasingly more complex and lessons are learned from previous contracts and processes. Current arrangements vary by fleet but range from in-house maintenance carried out by qualified service personnel to availability contracts, specifying airframe numbers and flying hours but inherently including maintenance.

Through this evolution, efficiencies have been made through the Department’s close partnership with industry and rationalisation of infrastructure and processes. The Royal Air Force and industry are committed to a strategy of continuous improvement of both the efficiency and the effectiveness of aircraft maintenance.

 

 

Question

Bob Ainsworth (Coventry North East, Labour)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence

(1) pursuant to the answer of 17 January 2012, Official Report, column 728W, on ex-servicemen: health services, how many patients referred to the Medical Assessment Programme suffering from (a) physical and (b) mental health disorders were subsequently directed back to the NHS in each of the last five years;

(2) what information and guidance he has provided to relevant (a) interest groups and (b) organisations on any changes in Medical Assessment Programme provision to patients presenting with physical health issues; and if he will place in the Library a copy of each item of information or guidance;

(3) how many patients were referred to the Medical Assessment Programme who had (a) physical and (b) mental disorders in each of the last five years.

Answer

Andrew Robathan (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Personnel, Welfare and Veterans), Defence; South Leicestershire, Conservative)

holding answer30 January 2012

Changes in the service provided by the Medical Assessment Programme have been notified on the Ministry of Defence (MOD), Veterans-UK, and NHS websites. I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 19 December 2011, Hansard, column 962W, in which I explained that copies of the Ministry of Defence web pages have been placed in the Library of the House. The MOD has received one inquiry relating to changes to the programme from the Royal British Legion in December 2011, and I have placed a copy of our response in the Library of the House.

The numbers of referrals for purely physical health problems over the last five years have been very low, but in such cases, referrals would be redirected through their general practitioner for treatment by the national health service (NHS), which has primary responsibility for health care provision to veterans. No records have been kept of the number of these cases in each of the last five years.

The number of client referrals for mental health assessments during the same period has been stable at around 100 referrals each year; in these cases the details of the assessment and recommendations on treatment, if required, would be provided to the relevant NHS body.

 

 

Question

Andrew Smith (Oxford East, Labour)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence

(1) whether funding for the Hydrus project has been reallocated to the Teutates programme;

(2) what the cost to the public purse is of the Teutates programme.

Answer

Peter Luff (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Equipment, Support and Technology), Defence; Mid Worcestershire, Conservative)

The Teutates programme is planned to deliver the hydrodynamics capability previously planned to be delivered through the Hydrus programme. Expenditure on Hydrus has therefore stopped; funding originally allocated for Hydrus has not, however, been reallocated to Teutates. The Teutates programme will seek the funding it requires separately, in accordance with established Ministry of Defence processes.

I am withholding cost information for the Teutates programme as its disclosure would prejudice commercial interests and impact on the formulation or development of Government policy.

 

 

Question

Graham Jones (Hyndburn, Labour)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what discussions he has had with UK Trade and Investment on the decision of the Indian Government not to buy the Eurofighter.

Answer

Peter Luff (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Equipment, Support and Technology), Defence; Mid Worcestershire, Conservative)

holding answer7 February 2012

We are obviously disappointed that the decision has been made by the Indian Government not to take forward Typhoon into the detailed negotiation stage of the Indian Medium Role Combat Aircraft competition.

The campaign to export Typhoon to India being led by Germany on behalf of the Partner Nations is receiving significant UK support.

There have been regular cross-Whitehall discussions throughout the campaign and MOD and UKTI remain in close touch on exports of Eurofighter Typhoon, including the campaign in India.

Ministerial colleagues and I will continue to provide support to all Typhoon export campaigns as part of an active and innovative defence diplomacy initiative.

 

 

Question

Greg Knight (East Yorkshire, Conservative)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much his Department has spent to change, alter, update or modify radar systems as a result of the presence or likely presence of UK on-shore wind farms; and if he will make a statement.

Answer

Peter Luff (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Equipment, Support and Technology), Defence; Mid Worcestershire, Conservative)

holding answer9 February 2012

The Ministry of Defence has not committed expenditure to change, alter, update or modify radar systems as a result of the presence, or likely presence, of UK on-shore wind farms. However, to overcome the interference to existing Ministry of Defence radars caused by wind farms, wind farm developers have agreed to fund the cost of three new wind farm tolerant radars.

 

 

Question

Mark Menzies (Fylde, Conservative)

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills

(1) what assistance his Department has provided to BAeSystems to help them with securing Typhoon export deals;

(2) how many meetings he has had with his German counterpart to discuss the possibility of selling Typhoon to the Indian Air Force; and what specific topics were discussed at those meetings.

Answer

Mark Prisk (Minister of State (Business and Enterprise), Business, Innovation and Skills; Hertford and Stortford, Conservative)

UK Trade & Investment Defence & Security Organisation has worked closely with BAeSystems over a number of years to assist them with Typhoon export campaigns. The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, my right hon. Friend Vince Cable, and other Ministers, have met representatives of the company on numerous occasions, and have discussed Typhoon export opportunities with counterparts in other nations.

The Secretary of State has not met with his German counterpart to discuss selling Typhoon to the Indian Air Force. However, there have been a number of meetings to discuss the German led campaign to promote Typhoon to the Indian Government, and how to progress that, between officials of this Government and their counterparts in Germany, as well as Ministers in other Departments.

 

 

Question

Dan Byles (North Warwickshire, Conservative)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the average cost of each meal provided to armed forces personnel was when stationed (a) in the UK, (b) in Germany and (c) overseas in an operational theatre in the latest period for which figures are available.

Answer

Peter Luff (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Equipment, Support and Technology), Defence; Mid Worcestershire, Conservative)

At any one time some 70% of armed forces personnel in the UK and permanent bases overseas are catered for through a number of Catering, Retail and Leisure and other multi-activity contracts (incorporating Pay As You Dine arrangements) to deliver this and other services. Contractors are required to offer a core meal, covering breakfast, lunch and dinner, with set calorific and nutritional standards, in line with the prevailing daily food charge, which is currently capped by the Armed Forces Pay Review body at a maximum of £4.25 per day in UK and €4.85 per day in Germany. Service personnel can, however, choose an alternative retail offering if they prefer. Those serving in the UK at sites not covered by these arrangements are charged the standard daily food charge of £4.25 per day.

Armed forces personnel serving on operations and exercises are not charged for the food provided to them.

 

 

Question

John Robertson (Glasgow North West, Labour)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what contracts his Department has awarded to Deloitte since May 2010; and what the (a) net and (b) individual monetary value was of each such contract.

Answer

Peter Luff (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Equipment, Support and Technology), Defence; Mid Worcestershire, Conservative)

holding answer30 January 2012

Since May 2010, MOD has awarded the following 16 contracts with Deloitte or associated companies:

Contract title Current contract value Current contract value (banded) Contract start date
Sector transformation main gate business case scoping study £27,762 Under £100,000 23 November 2010
Technical support to assist with the implementation of the LE OC portfolio governance arrangements £32,130 Under £100,000 2 December 2010
Facility of community consultation event at RAF Brampton £45,000 Under £100,000 1 April 2011
Facility of community consultation event at RAF Brampton £63,800 Under £100,000 9 September 2010
Generic vehicle architecture cost benefit analysis £81,917 Under £100,000 7 March 2011
Merlin PT structural review £90,006 Under £100,000 13 April 2011
Network enabled airspace defence and surveillance (NEADS) acquisition strategy and business model study—part 2 £100,762 £100,000-£250,000 14 September 2010
External assistance to the Army 2020 study £106,000 £100,000-£250,000 4 January 2012
Technical support to the re-negotiation process £120,000 £100,000-£250,000 22 September 2010
Provision of accountancy and secretariat support to review board for government contracts £139,776 £100,000-£250,000 1 April 2011
Supporting services audit £179,712 £100,000-£250,000 4 May 2010
Whole force (equipment support) pilot study RM 353 catalyst multi-disciplinary framework £185,175 £100,000-£250,000 14 December 2011
Provision of technical support to the defence core network service commercial team £694,179 £500,000-£1 million 20 June 2011
And equipment end to end (E2E) support study £998,528 £500,000-£1 million 21 January 2011
Project and programme management and technical advice to the Vulcan disposal and decommissioning (VDAD) programme £2,160,000 £1-£5 million 2 August 2010
External assistance for defence infrastructure transformation programme £2,214,295 £1-£5 million 28 March 2011

The total value of these contracts is £7,239,042.

 

 

Question

Madeleine Moon (Bridgend, Labour)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the cost to his Department is of deploying (a) Typhoon and (b) Tornado aircraft; how many people are needed to operate each such aircraft; and if he will make a statement.

Answer

Peter Luff (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Equipment, Support and Technology), Defence; Mid Worcestershire, Conservative)

The number of staff required to deploy aircraft will vary according to the scenario involved.

On costs, I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 14 September 2010, Hansard, column 928W, to Angus Robertson.

 

 

Question

Thomas Docherty (Dunfermline and West Fife, Labour)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 31 January 2012, Official Report, columns 575-6W, on military aircraft, how many (a) Apache, (b) Gazelle, (c) Hawk T1/T1A/T1W, (d) Islander Mk1 and Mk2, (e) Lynx Mk7, (f) Lynx Mk9/9a, (g) Sea King Mk3/3a, (h) Tornado GR4 and (i) Typhoon aircraft are based at each site listed in the answer.

Answer

Peter Luff (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Equipment, Support and Technology), Defence; Mid Worcestershire, Conservative)

holding answer6 February 2012

The number of aircraft at a particular Ministry of Defence operating base will vary on a day-to-day basis according to normal fleet management activities, including requirements for mandated maintenance, upgrade programmes and operational deployments. The information contained in the following table is correct as of 31 January 2012. Some of the bases listed in my answer of 31 January 2012, Hansard, columns 575-6W, do not appear in this table as there were no aircraft of the relevant type located there on this date.

Aircraft type Base Number
Apache Wattisham 26
Apache Middle Wallop 12
Gazelle Aldergrove 9
Gazelle Suffield (Canada) 4
Gazelle Middle Wallop 4
Hawk T1/T1A/T1W Valley 34
Hawk T1/T1A/T1W Leeming 18
Hawk T1/T1A/T1W Culdrose 15
Hawk T1/T1A/T1W Scampton 11
Islander Mk1 and Mk2 Aldergrove 1
Lynx Mk7 Odiham 5
Lynx Mk7 Yeovilton 6
Lynx Mk7 Gutersloh 8
Lynx Mk7 Middle Wallop 11
Lynx Mk9/9a Dishforth 5
Lynx Mk9/9a Odiham 1
Lynx Mk9/9a Middle Wallop 1
Sea King Mk3/3a Lossiemouth 2
Sea King Mk3/3a Boulmer 2
Sea King Mk3/3a Leconfield 2
Sea King Mk3/3a Valley 5
Sea King Mk3/3a Chivenor 2
Sea King Mk3/3a Wattisham 2
Sea King Mk3/3a Falkland Islands 2
Tornado GR4 Marham 65
Tornado GR4 Lossiemouth 48
Tornado GR4 Coningsby 4
Typhoon Coningsby 53
Typhoon Leuchars 19
Typhoon Falklands 4
Typhoon Warton 10

 

Question

Angus Robertson (Moray, Scottish National Party)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence

(1) what the full service date is for the RAF Voyager aircraft;

(2) how many successful (a) operational and (b) training in-flight refuelling missions the Voyager aircraft has made; and which aircraft were re-fuelled.

Answer

Peter Luff (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Equipment, Support and Technology), Defence; Mid Worcestershire, Conservative)

Full capability for the new platform will be achieved incrementally to achieve the in service date of May 2014. The full service date for the RAF Voyager aircraft is September 2016 when the fleet will consist of 14 aircraft.

There have been no operational or training flights.

 

 

Question

Angus Robertson (Moray, Scottish National Party)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much of the demonstrator contract for the Sea Ceptor missile he estimates will be spent in Scotland.

Answer

Peter Luff (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Equipment, Support and Technology), Defence; Mid Worcestershire, Conservative)

The Sea Ceptor Demonstration Phase contract, worth £483 million, has been placed with MBDA (UK) as prime contractor. The award of any sub-contract is the responsibility of MBDA.

 

 

Question

Maria Eagle (Garston and Halewood, Labour)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether his Department has agreed any contracts with (a) private hire vehicle and (b) taxi companies since May 2010.

Answer

Peter Luff (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Equipment, Support and Technology), Defence; Mid Worcestershire, Conservative)

The Ministry of Defence (MOD), under Project Phoenix, signed a contract in August 2011 with Babcock International Group PLC, as part of a pan-Government Framework agreement, which covers the management of fleet and self drive vehicles for MOD personnel in the UK. This contract is gradually replacing the existing arrangements and includes a provision, which is still to be introduced, for vehicles with a driver (i.e. private hire vehicles); however this comprises only a very small element of the overall contract.

Outside of this contract, military units may operate local arrangements with taxi companies or with private hire companies. These details are not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

 

 

Question

Luciana Berger (Liverpool, Wavertree, Labour)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many away days his Department has held since May 2010; what the location was of each such away day; how many staff attended; and what the cost was of each such event.

Answer

Andrew Robathan (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Personnel, Welfare and Veterans), Defence; South Leicestershire, Conservative)

This information is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

The Ministry of Defence (MOD) is committed to developing its staff and there are benefits from holding away days and team building events. In the light of the current economic climate, however, we have instructed staff that such events should not be authorised unless they can be held at no extra cost on MOD premises.

 

 

Question

Jim Murphy (East Renfrewshire, Labour)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much (a) his Department, (b) the Chief of the Defence Staff, (c) the Chief of the General Staff, (d) the Chief of the Air Staff, (e) the First Sea Lord, (f) the Adjutant General, (g) the Commander in Chief Land General, (h) the General Officer Commanding Northern Ireland and (i) the General Officer Commanding London District spent on (i) staff, (ii) rent, (iii) utilities and (iv) maintenance in the latest period for which figures are available.

Answer

Philip Hammond (Secretary of State, Transport; Runnymede and Weybridge, Conservative)

holding answer10 January 2012

Under previous arrangements, Official Service Residences (OSRs) were provided for senior officers in certain posts which required them to undertake official hospitality for Defence purposes. As announced by the Minister for Defence Personnel, Welfare and Veterans, my right hon. Friend Mr Robathan, on 12 December 2011, Hansard, column 63WS, as part of our plans to tackle the deficit this Government inherited, these arrangements have now been discontinued and a new Domestic Assistance policy will realise savings of at least £3 million per year from April 2012.

Figures for expenditure on Official Service Residences in the financial year 2010-11 are currently being finalised. For the financial year 2009-10 the costs associated with the properties occupied by these senior officers are set out in the following table. The Adjutant-General has not been included as he did not occupy an Official Service Residence during the period. It should be emphasised that responsibility for decisions on expenditure relating to these properties lies with the Ministry of Defence, and not with the officers who occupied them at the time, or the current occupants.

£
Post Household staff Rent Utilitiesl (1) Planned maintenance
Chief of the Defence Staff 128,000 17,000 450
1st Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff 161,000 18,000 520
Chief of the General Staff 161,000 (2)108,000 0
Chief of the Air Staff 97,000 49,000 250
Commander in Chief Land 17,600 18,000 440
General Officer Commanding London District 102,000 16,000 136,000
General Officer Commanding Northern Ireland 80,000 9,000 3,500 6,000
(1) Expenditure relating to utilities for this financial year is not held centrally for the majority of properties. (2 )This property is part of the Crown Estate and a grant in aid is payable.

Expenditure relating to Official Service Residences was kept under close scrutiny and when it was practical to do so, staff were utilised from other residences in support of a function to maximise the use of resources. Civilian staff were retained unless the use of Service personnel was more appropriate for security reasons.

 

 

Question

David Wright (Telford, Labour)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence

(1) when he plans to start the procurement process for the defence logistics supply chain (storage and distribution) business; and what the timetable is for completing the process;

(2) what work his Department has completed on option appraisal for the future of the defence logistical supply chain (storage and distribution) business;

(3) what the (a) scope and (b) structure of the procurement process is for the defence logistics supply chain (storage and distribution) business.

Answer

Peter Luff (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Equipment, Support and Technology), Defence; Mid Worcestershire, Conservative)

holding answer2 February 2012

The Ministry of Defence’s Logistic Commodities and Services group, which includes the storage and distribution function, is currently developing a Transformation Programme which will consider a number of options.

 

 

Question

Stephen Barclay (North East Cambridgeshire, Conservative)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence

(1) how much his Department spent on (a) warehousing, (b) staff, (c) IT and (d) transport costs for managing its defence inventory in the latest period for which figures are available;

(2) which carrier companies his Department uses in respect of its defence inventory; and how much it spent with each carrier for each defence class of inventory item in the latest period for which figures are available;

(3) what estimate he has made of the (a) gross value and (b) impaired value of (i) capital spares, (ii) consumable spares, (iii) explosive capital items and (iv) consumable explosive items in the defence inventory;

(4) what estimate he has made of the proportion of the defence inventory which is surplus to military requirements and is stored (a) in the UK, (b) in Germany and (c) elsewhere;

(5) what estimate his Department has made of the proportion of the defence inventory which is not fit for immediate military issue.

Answer

Peter Luff (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Equipment, Support and Technology), Defence; Mid Worcestershire, Conservative)

holding answer6 February 2012

This information is not held centrally and will take time to collate. I will write to my hon. Friend as soon as this task has been completed.

 

 

Question

Stephen Barclay (North East Cambridgeshire, Conservative)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence

(1) what plans his Department has to (a) close and (b) reduce in size locations in Germany used for the warehousing of defence inventory items; and what estimate his Department has made of the associated cost of disposal or shipment of items stored in those locations;

(2) what revenue has been raised from the disposal of defence inventory items in each category in the last 12 months;

(3) what (a) surplus and (b) obsolete items in the defence inventory and located in (i) the UK, (ii) Germany and (iii) elsewhere his Department has identified in the last 12 months.

Answer

Peter Luff (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Equipment, Support and Technology), Defence; Mid Worcestershire, Conservative)

holding answer7 February 2012

This information is not held centrally and will take time to collate. I will write to the hon. Member as soon as this task has been completed.

 

 

Question

Madeleine Moon (Bridgend, Labour)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many pieces of heavy duty cutting equipment capable of assisting with the rescue of injured armed forces personnel from armoured vehicles are available in each country; and if he will make a statement.

Answer

Peter Luff (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Equipment, Support and Technology), Defence; Mid Worcestershire, Conservative)

The Ministry of Defence has no requirement for specialist cutting equipment to assist in the rescue of personnel trapped in armoured vehicles. Modifications and enhancements to protected mobility vehicles enable personnel to be released more quickly in the event of an incident, which include the introduction of first responder tools. Future modifications will include external hinges on identified vehicle access points, to provide first responders with an ability to gain access quickly.

 

 

Question

Angus Robertson (Moray, Scottish National Party)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether he plans to equip the Mark-8 MOD 1 delivery vehicles with lithium-ion batteries.

Answer

Peter Luff (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Defence Equipment, Support and Technology), Defence; Mid Worcestershire, Conservative)

There are no plans to equip the Mark-8 MOD 1 delivery vehicle with lithium-ion batteries.

 

Question

Angus Robertson (Moray, Scottish National Party)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has to move the Royal Air Force Mountain Rescue Team from RAF Kinloss.

Answer

Nick Harvey (Minister of State (Armed Forces), Defence; North Devon, Liberal Democrat)

There are no plans to move the Mountain Rescue Service from RAF Kinloss.

 

Question

Jim Shannon (Strangford, DUP)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what discussions he has had with his Afghan counterpart on the number of Afghan personnel needed to assist each branch of the UK armed forces located in Afghanistan; and how many such Afghan personnel there were providing such assistance in the latest period for which figures are available.

Answer

Philip Hammond (Secretary of State, Transport; Runnymede and Weybridge, Conservative)

The recruitment of locally employed civilians by the UK is not an issue routinely discussed with the Afghan Government.

The UK currently employs 966 locally engaged civilians in Afghanistan. These work directly and indirectly in support of operations, but none are employed in a combat role. Locally engaged civilians play an important and valued role in Afghanistan, undertaking roles that are more economically or more appropriately undertaken by contracted personnel. The Government keeps under review the roles they play and the scale of contracted effort in the light of the evolving operation.

 

 

Question

Mark Lancaster (Milton Keynes North, Conservative)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the effect of the biannual change of brigade and its leadership on the effectiveness of operations in Afghanistan.

Answer

Philip Hammond (Secretary of State, Transport; Runnymede and Weybridge, Conservative)

There are a number of measures in place to minimise the effect of the biannual changeover of brigade on operational effectiveness in Afghanistan. These include extensive pre-deployment training, which incorporates regular interaction between the current and future brigades, and a staggered handover process over a few weeks. There are, in addition, a number of key posts that deploy for longer periods of time and/or are phased in their deployment to aid continuity. The biannual change of brigade is kept under review in line with wider planning for our operations in Afghanistan.

 

 

Question

Greg Knight (East Yorkshire, Conservative)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 23 January 2012, Official Report, column 4W, on entertainers: Afghanistan, what the name was of each of the show business personalities and sporting professionals who visited Afghanistan in the last year at public expense; whether they were paid a fee from the public purse; what the amount paid was in each such case; and whether any audio or video recordings took place during such trips for broadcast or commercial use.

Answer

Philip Hammond (Secretary of State, Transport; Runnymede and Weybridge, Conservative)

holding answer30 January 2012

A small number of high-profile show business and sporting personalities have visited Afghanistan. In 2011, celebrity visitors included Cheryl Cole, Colin Montgomery, Tim Westwood (who visited twice) and England rugby players Neil Back and Steve Thompson. None of these received a fee from the public purse. Tim Westwood broadcast a number of radio programmes from Afghanistan and Cheryl Cole was filmed for the Pride of Britain awards television programme.

In addition, the Department has a contract with Combined Services Entertainment to provide performances by bands, comedians and dancers. The total cost of fees for performances in Afghanistan by entertainment personnel under the Combined Services Entertainment contract for 2011 was £205,782. The amount paid to these performers is commercial in confidence. No audio or video recordings for broadcast or commercial use took place during such trips.

 

 

Operation Herrick 16 Roulement – Statement

Philip Hammond (Secretary of State, Transport; Runnymede and Weybridge, Conservative)

I regret that the written ministerial statement I laid on 7 February, Hansard, column 11WS, contained an error of detail. I am therefore laying a revised statement today.

The next roulement of UK forces in Afghanistan is due to take place in April 2012. The UK’s current framework Brigade in Helmand, 20th Armoured Brigade, will be replaced by 12th Mechanised Brigade. The forces deploying include:

12th Mechanised Brigade Headquarters and Signal Squadron (228)
Elements of 19th Light Brigade Headquarters
Headquarters102 Logistic Brigade
857 Naval Air Squadron
The King’s Royal Hussars
The Light Dragoons
Elements of 1st Royal Tank Regiment
Elements of The Royal Wessex Yeomanry
19th Regiment Royal Artillery
Elements of 5th Regiment Royal Artillery
Elements of 12th Regiment Royal Artillery
Elements of 16th Regiment Royal Artillery
Elements of 32nd Regiment Royal Artillery
Elements of 39th Regiment Royal Artillery
Elements of 40th Regiment Royal Artillery
26 Engineer Regiment
Elements of The Royal Monmouthshire Royal Engineers (Militia)
Elements of 21 Engineer Regiment
Elements of 33 Engineer Regiment (Explosive Ordnance Disposal)
Elements of 36 Engineer Regiment (Search)
Elements of 38 Engineer Regiment
Elements of 42 Engineer Regiment (Geographical)
Elements of The Military Stabilisation and Support Group
Elements of 170 (Infrastructure Support) Engineer Group
16th Signal Regiment
Elements of 10th Signal Regiment
Elements of 14th Signal Regiment (Electronic Warfare)
Elements of 21st Signal Regiment (Air Support)
1st Battalion The Grenadier Guards
1st Battalion The Welsh Guards
1st Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment
3rd Battalion The Yorkshire Regiment (Duke of Wellington’s Regiment)
1st Battalion The Royal Welsh
3rd Battalion The Rifles
Elements of The London Regiment
Elements of 3rd Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment
Elements of 4th Battalion The Yorkshire Regiment
Elements of 3rd Battalion the Royal Welsh
Elements of 6th Battalion The Rifles
Elements of 3 Regiment Army Air Corps
Elements of 4 Regiment Army Air Corps
Elements of 6 Regiment Army Air Corps
Elements of 9 Regiment Army Air Corps
Elements of Joint Helicopter Support Squadron
Elements of Allied Rapid Reaction Corps Support Battalion
4 Logistic Support Regiment, The Royal Logistic Corps
10 The Queen’s Own Ghurkha Logistic Regiment
Elements of 9 Regiment, The Royal Logistic Corps
Elements of 11 Explosive Ordnance Disposal Regiment, The Royal Logistic Corps
Elements of 17 Port and Maritime Regiment, The Royal Logistic Corps
Elements of 23 Pioneer Regiment, The Royal Logistic Corps
Elements of 24 Regiment, The Royal Logistic Corps
Elements of 27 Regiment, The Royal Logistic Corps
Elements of 29 Regiment, The Royal Logistic Corps
Elements of 88 Postal and Courier Regiment (Volunteers), The Royal Logistic Corps
Elements of 148 Expeditionary Force Institute Squadron (Volunteers), The Royal Logistic Corps
Elements of 152 Transport Regiment (Volunteers), The Royal Logistic Corps
Elements of 159 Supply Regiment (Volunteers), The Royal Logistic Corps
Elements of 162 Movement Regiment (Volunteers), The Royal Logistic Corps
Elements of 166 Supply Regiment (Volunteers), The Royal Logistic Corps
Elements of 151 Transport Regiment (Volunteers), The Royal Logistic Corps
Elements of the Catering Support Regiment (Volunteers), The Royal Logistic Corps
Elements of the Operational Headquarters Support Group (Volunteers), The Royal Logistic Corps
4th Medical Regiment
22nd Field Hospital
Elements of 254 Medical Regiment (Volunteers)
4th Close Support Battalion Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers
Elements of 104 Force Support Battalion Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers
174 Provost Company Royal Military Police
Elements of 160 Provost Company Royal Military Police
Elements of Special Investigations Branch United Kingdom
Elements of The Military Provost Staff
Elements of 1st Military Working Dogs Regiment
Elements of 1st Military Intelligence Battalion
Elements of 2nd Military Intelligence Battalion
Elements of 3rd Military Intelligence Battalion
Elements of 4th Military Intelligence Battalion
Elements of 5th Military Intelligence Battalion
Elements of The Defence Cultural Specialist Unit
Elements of 15 Psychological Operations Group
604 Tactical Air Control Party
614 Tactical Air Control Party
621 Tactical Air Control Party
632 Tactical Air Control Party
2 (Army Co-Operation) Squadron, Royal Air Force
Elements of 24 Squadron, Royal Air Force
Elements of 30 Squadron, Royal Air Force
12(B) Squadron, Royal Air Force
Elements of 5 (Army Co-Operation) Squadron, Royal Air Force
Elements of 32 Squadron Royal Air Force
Elements of 28 Squadron, Royal Air Force
Elements of 216 Squadron Royal Air Force
Elements of 101 Squadron Royal Air Force
Elements of 39 Squadron Royal Air Force
Elements of 27 Squadron, Royal Air Force
Elements of 18 Squadron, Royal Air Force
617 Squadron, Royal Air Force
Elements of 99 Squadron Royal Air Force
Elements of 78 Squadron, Royal Air Force
Number 5 Royal Air Force, Force Protection Wing Headquarters
Elements of Number 2 Royal Air Force Police Wing
Elements of Number 3 Royal Air Force Police Wing
51 Squadron, Royal Air Force Regiment
Elements of the Tactical Supply Wing, Royal Air Force
Elements of 1 Air Mobility Wing, Royal Air Force
Elements of 1 Air Control Centre, Royal Air Force
Elements of 90 Signals Unit, Royal Air Force
Elements of 2 (Mechanical Transport) Squadron, Royal Air Force
Elements of 5001 Squadron, Royal Air Force
Elements of 3 Mobile Catering Squadron
Elements of Tactical Medical Wing
Elements of 1 (Expeditionary Logistics) Squadron
Elements of 93 (Expeditionary Armaments) Squadron
Elements of Tactical Imagery Wing
Elements of 5131 (BD) Sqn.

Volunteer and ex-Regular members of the reserve forces will continue to deploy to Afghanistan as part of this integrated force package, and we expect to issue around 300 call-out notices. On completion of their mobilisation procedures, the reservists will undertake a period of training and, where applicable, integration with their respective receiving units. The majority will serve on operations for around six months. As part of this commitment, we expect up to six members of the sponsored reserves to be in theatre at any one time.

The UK’s conventional force level is expected to remain at 9,500 for the duration of the deployment.

I shall make a further statement on the units we expect to serve under 12th Mechanised Brigade’s planned replacement formation, 4th Mechanised Brigade, nearer the time of their deployment.

About Think Defence

Think Defence hopes to start sensible conversations about UK defence issues, no agenda or no campaign but there might be one or two posts on containers, bridges and mexeflotes!

One thought on “Parliamentary Answers – to 10th February 2012

  1. Pingback: Tornado Aircraft Pictures | Airplane Prints

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>