Home » Land, Sea and Air » TMV 6×6
About the author
Think Defence hopes to get people talking about defence issues, nothing more, nothing less. Please check out the Think Defence Tumblr for news snippets, images and videos; thinkdefence.tumblr.com
More posts by Think Defence
Share this article
Recent Posts
- Vital Defence Equipment
- Reasons for Rafale
- A Think Defence Piece About Think Defence
- Parliamentary Answers – to 8th February 2012
- Select Committee – Operations in Libya
- Magic Bullets
- It Was Different in My Day
- Nothing New Under the Sun
- The Post Afghanistan Vehicle Lottery
- UK Military Bridging – Look Back Look Forward
- UK Military Bridging – Equipment (Trackway)
- UK Military Bridging – Equipment (Air Portable Bridges)
- UK Military Bridging – Equipment (BR90 and REBS)
- Industrial and Technology Matters
- Consultants on Five Grand a Day at the MoD
Advert
Search Think Defence
Recent Comments
- martin on Reasons for RafaleEverything i have read points to price although I think the comments made by TD are also very valid. India's
- martin on The Post Afghanistan Vehicle Lottery500 million is a hell of allot of money when not actually getting any vehicles. We can talk about 15%
- wf on A Think Defence Piece About Think Defence@jed: Last time I was subscribed it had a scrollback of 20 posts. Very easy to burst over that, on
- jed on A Think Defence Piece About Think DefenceWF I already subscribe to an RSS feed for all comments! Just need to hunt around to find it I
- Gareth Jones on Magic BulletsSome interesting figures in the link I posted above. "Today 45% of the worlds population live in cities. 470-85% are
- wf on A Think Defence Piece About Think DefenceRSS feed for comments. Make it for all comments, and have a 200 comment buffer: we all mix between threads
- wf on Reasons for RafaleRe the Mirage 2000, it's noticeable that both Taiwan and the UAE are trying to get rid of their 2000-5's,
- Ant on A Think Defence Piece About Think DefenceShort wishlist: 1) Edit function for those "oh bolloks" moments. 2) Comment box larger and wider so you can see
Upcoming Posts
- Another Busy Time for HMS Ocean
- Quick Links
- A Comedic Tour de Force
- San Carlos FOB and Black Buck What Ifs
- Being Serious About Piracy
- The Future of the British Army – Logistics
- Soft Power or Soft Option
- The Future of the British Army – Cyber
- A Springer Shaped Waste of £7 Million
- Yet Another Look at FRES UV
Don't miss it - Subscribe by RSS.

7 Comments
Are they joking, that thing is freakin huge, I like their Truck and APC version but this a bit daft!!
I agree with Ian that thing is massive. Also if we are supposed to be getting out of Afghanistan in a few years we don’t need it.
Again a company ‘suggesting’ a high mobility vehicle demonstrates it by driving at mediocre speeds over roads accessible to the average family saloon. I’m sure it’s an excellent vehicle, but the film does nothing to demonstrate this.
There is a good reason why the vehicle is trundling so slowly in the video….the TMV team had just one day to do the filming at Millbrook prior to the launch at DVD. Typically, the vehicle entered de-rate and couldn’t be sorted in time…hence the ultra slow speed. It IS huge though and why are there civvies driving it? At least get some proper rig on..
The underlying TMV design is pretty mature I think, the one shown in the clip does look massive, good for looking over walls I suppose!
I do think the TMV is a pretty good design, but this application is one step too far should be left to the Jackal/Coyote or the WMIK Ocelot.
I would like to see the Ocelot in 4×4 and 6×6 in various forms for light duties in A,B,C applicatons, the TMV in 4×4,6×6 and 8×8 for medium duties (including a protected mobility vehicle) and the MAN trucks for the rest.
I know this runs into this post
http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2010/07/fdr-%e2%80%93-land-logistics-and-combat-service-support-3/
But we all demand commonality in vehicles so the posts will start to merge
I might try and do a summary post on vehicles to tie these various ideas together no I have covered the individual parts in detail