<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FDR – Wading into the Maritime Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/12/fdr-wading-into-the-maritime-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/12/fdr-wading-into-the-maritime-debate/</link>
	<description>A progressive view on UK military affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euan</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/12/fdr-wading-into-the-maritime-debate/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Euan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=1617#comment-562</guid>
		<description>Ahh! The RFA excellent discussion topic i would agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh! The RFA excellent discussion topic i would agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Daly</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/12/fdr-wading-into-the-maritime-debate/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>James Daly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=1617#comment-561</guid>
		<description>How about a discussion about maritime logistics, the RFA and the Merchant Navy? Particularly timely given the current review of the RFA and the threat of privatisation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a discussion about maritime logistics, the RFA and the Merchant Navy? Particularly timely given the current review of the RFA and the threat of privatisation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/12/fdr-wading-into-the-maritime-debate/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 02:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=1617#comment-556</guid>
		<description>Well as a descendant of Portsmouth I should know a bit about this subject. I don&#039;t, but I should.

By multi tier force I presume you mean the surface fleet? Frigates, destroyers, amphibious ships etc, Which I think probably merit their own discussion.

There&#039;s the replacement for the type 22 and inevitably the type 23. The 6/8/12 type 45&#039;s is a discussion in itself let alone talk of the ship and it&#039;s capabilities, and while we now have a modern amphibious capability, this should still be reviewed.

And then on top of that we probably need to have a think about what sort of missions we want the navy to do which should bring the whole discussion to an open/close depending on it&#039;s placement in the list.

Well, that&#039;s a few starter points. I&#039;m of to go read the entirety of navy matters</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as a descendant of Portsmouth I should know a bit about this subject. I don&#8217;t, but I should.</p>
<p>By multi tier force I presume you mean the surface fleet? Frigates, destroyers, amphibious ships etc, Which I think probably merit their own discussion.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s the replacement for the type 22 and inevitably the type 23. The 6/8/12 type 45&#8242;s is a discussion in itself let alone talk of the ship and it&#8217;s capabilities, and while we now have a modern amphibious capability, this should still be reviewed.</p>
<p>And then on top of that we probably need to have a think about what sort of missions we want the navy to do which should bring the whole discussion to an open/close depending on it&#8217;s placement in the list.</p>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s a few starter points. I&#8217;m of to go read the entirety of navy matters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/12/fdr-wading-into-the-maritime-debate/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=1617#comment-555</guid>
		<description>Ooooh goody, can&#039;t wait ;-) Was going to do a big pre-emptive comment, but speaking o&#039;pirates, the third Pirates of the Caribbean movie has just come on telly, and as I have not seen it, I am off to watch that instead, arrgghhh !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooooh goody, can&#8217;t wait ;-) Was going to do a big pre-emptive comment, but speaking o&#8217;pirates, the third Pirates of the Caribbean movie has just come on telly, and as I have not seen it, I am off to watch that instead, arrgghhh !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euan</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/12/fdr-wading-into-the-maritime-debate/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Euan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=1617#comment-554</guid>
		<description>ADMIN said “We are an island you know!” Well I never I always wondered what all that blue stuff around that UK is on my large wall map, I thought some joker painted it blue. All we have to do is convince the politicians and public of this fact.

Erm! A good discussion topic would be shipbuilding, what should we build here, what should be build abroad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ADMIN said “We are an island you know!” Well I never I always wondered what all that blue stuff around that UK is on my large wall map, I thought some joker painted it blue. All we have to do is convince the politicians and public of this fact.</p>
<p>Erm! A good discussion topic would be shipbuilding, what should we build here, what should be build abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Daly</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/12/fdr-wading-into-the-maritime-debate/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>James Daly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=1617#comment-553</guid>
		<description>I definitely agree with inter-service rivalries as a theme. It staggers me how much they seem to brief against each other and try to undermine each other. Is it a cultural thing? I suspect so... loyalties seem to be to a senior officers service rather than UK defence as a whole.

sorry, I&#039;ll stop now so as to not pre-empt!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely agree with inter-service rivalries as a theme. It staggers me how much they seem to brief against each other and try to undermine each other. Is it a cultural thing? I suspect so&#8230; loyalties seem to be to a senior officers service rather than UK defence as a whole.</p>
<p>sorry, I&#8217;ll stop now so as to not pre-empt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grim</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/12/fdr-wading-into-the-maritime-debate/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Grim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=1617#comment-552</guid>
		<description>Perhaps a good time to cover the Vanguards and the nuclear deterrent?

As always I look forward to seeing what you have to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a good time to cover the Vanguards and the nuclear deterrent?</p>
<p>As always I look forward to seeing what you have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

