<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OUVS (Operational Utility Vehicle System)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/ouvs-operational-utility-vehicle-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/ouvs-operational-utility-vehicle-system/</link>
	<description>A progressive view on UK military affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArmChairCivvy</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/ouvs-operational-utility-vehicle-system/#comment-34748</link>
		<dc:creator>ArmChairCivvy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=834#comment-34748</guid>
		<description>Thanks Phil, covering so much ground in one piece of writing!

RE &quot;Copperhead (Thales). The latter is based on the Bushmaster infantry mobility vehicle, which recently entered limited service with the British Army.&quot;
- the Bushmaster news have passed me by: Do you know how limited/ used by whom?

RE &quot;the total disaster that was the FCLV (Future Command &amp; Liaison Vehicle) programme which resulted in the next to useless Panther CLV

... of the 401ordered over five years ago a mere 60 odd are to be sent to Afghanistan, the rest are not considered fit for the front-line and will be used for training.&quot;
- I agree with the assessment of the outcome; TD was even more disparaging saying that they have been given to the RAF Regiment (I am! joking, of course)
- but wasn&#039;t there a rationale that when all the EU-hatted forces would ride out to keep the peace (rather than make it), there would be a standard command vehicle across the temporarily knitted-together force? 
... As in &quot;helicoptering spare parts across the vastness of Darfur&quot;

I fully agree with your Ranger-related thoughts &quot;is a range of vehicles from 4×4 through to 8×8 is interesting. Details are very sketchy but it could provide the basis for the Utility version of FRES&quot;
- but do we know anything about the price (a ball park figure)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Phil, covering so much ground in one piece of writing!</p>
<p>RE &#8220;Copperhead (Thales). The latter is based on the Bushmaster infantry mobility vehicle, which recently entered limited service with the British Army.&#8221;<br />
- the Bushmaster news have passed me by: Do you know how limited/ used by whom?</p>
<p>RE &#8220;the total disaster that was the FCLV (Future Command &amp; Liaison Vehicle) programme which resulted in the next to useless Panther CLV</p>
<p>&#8230; of the 401ordered over five years ago a mere 60 odd are to be sent to Afghanistan, the rest are not considered fit for the front-line and will be used for training.&#8221;<br />
- I agree with the assessment of the outcome; TD was even more disparaging saying that they have been given to the RAF Regiment (I am! joking, of course)<br />
- but wasn&#8217;t there a rationale that when all the EU-hatted forces would ride out to keep the peace (rather than make it), there would be a standard command vehicle across the temporarily knitted-together force?<br />
&#8230; As in &#8220;helicoptering spare parts across the vastness of Darfur&#8221;</p>
<p>I fully agree with your Ranger-related thoughts &#8220;is a range of vehicles from 4×4 through to 8×8 is interesting. Details are very sketchy but it could provide the basis for the Utility version of FRES&#8221;<br />
- but do we know anything about the price (a ball park figure)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Maxwell</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/ouvs-operational-utility-vehicle-system/#comment-34741</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Maxwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=834#comment-34741</guid>
		<description>Hi

It would seem that this project has been canceled after reading an artical in G3 Defence Vol.3 Issue.5 Oct 2011</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>It would seem that this project has been canceled after reading an artical in G3 Defence Vol.3 Issue.5 Oct 2011</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

