<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: British Army Vehicles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/british-army-vehicles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/british-army-vehicles/</link>
	<description>A progressive view on UK military affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:13:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think Defence</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/british-army-vehicles/#comment-38552</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Defence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=866#comment-38552</guid>
		<description>Welcome to TD Hayden, I really need to update this post !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to TD Hayden, I really need to update this post !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hayden</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/british-army-vehicles/#comment-38549</link>
		<dc:creator>hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=866#comment-38549</guid>
		<description>what bout the sldt iveco trakker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what bout the sldt iveco trakker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArmChairCivvy</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/british-army-vehicles/#comment-36446</link>
		<dc:creator>ArmChairCivvy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=866#comment-36446</guid>
		<description>Hi Scorer,

It wasn&#039;t clear whether you were looking for just something in the UK service already, or generally.

Once you decide the size (of what needs launching), there are good data sheets to download here:
http://www.epicos.com/EPCompanyProfileWeb/Products.aspx?id=669
&quot;a complete product range for various UAV types (from 10 to 500 kg). The designed maximum launching power is 8,500 kW accordingly&quot;
- some of them have been performance tested by DERA in the Hebrides</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scorer,</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t clear whether you were looking for just something in the UK service already, or generally.</p>
<p>Once you decide the size (of what needs launching), there are good data sheets to download here:<br />
<a href="http://www.epicos.com/EPCompanyProfileWeb/Products.aspx?id=669" rel="nofollow">http://www.epicos.com/EPCompanyProfileWeb/Products.aspx?id=669</a><br />
&#8220;a complete product range for various UAV types (from 10 to 500 kg). The designed maximum launching power is 8,500 kW accordingly&#8221;<br />
- some of them have been performance tested by DERA in the Hebrides</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Scorer</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/british-army-vehicles/#comment-36441</link>
		<dc:creator>R Scorer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=866#comment-36441</guid>
		<description>Looking for a UAV Launch Vehicle (truck) any ideas please</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking for a UAV Launch Vehicle (truck) any ideas please</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/british-army-vehicles/#comment-31553</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=866#comment-31553</guid>
		<description>What about, Samson, Samaritan, Striker,Warrior 511 &amp; 512, CRARRV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about, Samson, Samaritan, Striker,Warrior 511 &amp; 512, CRARRV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think Defence</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/british-army-vehicles/#comment-11358</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Defence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=866#comment-11358</guid>
		<description>Thanks fellas, correction made, should have known better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks fellas, correction made, should have known better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/british-army-vehicles/#comment-11357</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=866#comment-11357</guid>
		<description>The sefl loading dump truck is a Volvo FL12 SLDT not Iveco</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sefl loading dump truck is a Volvo FL12 SLDT not Iveco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think Defence</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/british-army-vehicles/#comment-9535</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Defence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=866#comment-9535</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike, will get to it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike, will get to it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/british-army-vehicles/#comment-9534</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=866#comment-9534</guid>
		<description>what about the foden 6x6 wrecker? all time classic army wagon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about the foden 6&#215;6 wrecker? all time classic army wagon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/british-army-vehicles/#comment-8986</link>
		<dc:creator>barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=866#comment-8986</guid>
		<description>The pic of a Light Wheeled Tractor All Arms JCB 3CX CSM
is wrong its a Light Wheeled Tractor JCB 4CX. (Royal Engineers) there is a All Arms JCB 3CX tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pic of a Light Wheeled Tractor All Arms JCB 3CX CSM<br />
is wrong its a Light Wheeled Tractor JCB 4CX. (Royal Engineers) there is a All Arms JCB 3CX tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/09/british-army-vehicles/#comment-6565</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/?p=866#comment-6565</guid>
		<description>Admin, thanks for this.

Apart from the tracked stuff, fork lifts, bulldozers &amp; specialty logistics, very small stuff (bikes ,quads etc) i make that roughly 12 different vehicles in the light to medium weight range. 
That&#039;s if you count the land rovers as one type &amp; without inc. Coyote, Jackel &amp; Fuchs.

We are crazy aren&#039;t we, just plain nuts. Just thinking about the logistics train to supply the spare parts for all this different equipment is making my head hurt. Then i remember that this is just to keep the logistics train going so it can fulfill it&#039;s role of being the logistic&#039;s train/people mover for the Army itself.

Sorry this is more an observation, but, they really are crazy. The costs of having such a varied fleet of vehicles, sorry forget that bit.......does the army have so many types of vehicles on purpose, as a hedge against the failure of a design in actual use, meaning in a war?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admin, thanks for this.</p>
<p>Apart from the tracked stuff, fork lifts, bulldozers &amp; specialty logistics, very small stuff (bikes ,quads etc) i make that roughly 12 different vehicles in the light to medium weight range.<br />
That&#8217;s if you count the land rovers as one type &amp; without inc. Coyote, Jackel &amp; Fuchs.</p>
<p>We are crazy aren&#8217;t we, just plain nuts. Just thinking about the logistics train to supply the spare parts for all this different equipment is making my head hurt. Then i remember that this is just to keep the logistics train going so it can fulfill it&#8217;s role of being the logistic&#8217;s train/people mover for the Army itself.</p>
<p>Sorry this is more an observation, but, they really are crazy. The costs of having such a varied fleet of vehicles, sorry forget that bit&#8230;&#8230;.does the army have so many types of vehicles on purpose, as a hedge against the failure of a design in actual use, meaning in a war?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

